H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karol Kucera vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 1-2
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–1 lead over Karol Kucera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on carpet, while Karol Kucera leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1999 London quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1999* | London | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-1 6-3 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1998* | New Haven | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Karol Kucera | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1996* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 6-4 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karol Kucera | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |