H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Karsten Braasch vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-1
David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Karsten Braasch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1992 Casablanca third round 2-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1992* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Prinosil | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Karsten Braasch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karsten Braasch | #1,445 | #38 | 878 | 1,731 | 68 | 93 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karsten Braasch | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #62 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #56 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #167 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #489 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #271 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #261 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #437 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |