H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Karsten Braasch vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 1-0

Karsten Braasch holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karsten Braasch leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Karsten Braasch won the 1992 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 3-6 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karsten Braasch
GER Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karsten Braasch #120 6-3 3-6 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 Diego Nargiso #91 Match data Jun 24, 1992* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karsten Braasch #1,445 #38 878 1,731 68 93 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karsten Braasch Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1989 2–3 40.0% #226 1,512 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1990 0–1 0.0% #257 1,494 0 0 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1991 2–3 40.0% #146 1,525 0 0 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1992 7–14 33.3% #90 1,529 0 0 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1993 14–16 46.7% #62 1,649 0 0 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 1994 26–31 45.6% #56 1,598 0 0 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 1995 9–14 39.1% #167 1,592 0 0 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 1996 0–1 0.0% #489 1,577 0 0 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 1997 2–3 40.0% #200 1,618 0 0 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 1998 3–4 42.9% #271 1,603 0 0 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 1999 1–2 33.3% #261 1,590 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2000 2–1 66.7% #437 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karsten Braasch Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1992 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 1994 16 15 31 51.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1995 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 42 77 45.5% 15 26 41 36.6% 11 14 25 44.0% 7 11 18 38.9% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/155 of Karsten Braasch's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karsten Braasch Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 1991 5/5 4.2 2.2 48.7% 74.1% 47.5% 49.6% 52.7% 60.7% 41.9% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 1992 15/21 6.1 2.7 57.4% 69.5% 43.1% 60.8% 35.9% 58.3% 36.4% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 1993 26/30 5.5 2.7 54.2% 73.8% 47.2% 59.2% 37.0% 61.5% 38.1% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 1994 43/57 6.3 3.0 52.5% 74.1% 43.6% 55.5% 44.5% 59.4% 34.8% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 1995 16/23 9.8 2.6 56.5% 72.8% 48.0% 63.3% 33.8% 61.7% 34.2% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 1996 1/1 13.0 1.0 63.9% 69.8% 23.3% 25.0% 26.3% 53.0% 45.2% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 1997 2/5 23.0 2.0 62.9% 86.3% 40.8% 61.1% 23.7% 69.4% 34.2% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 1998 4/7 7.5 4.5 56.7% 72.3% 42.3% 60.7% 24.2% 59.3% 29.5% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
31 1999 2/3 4.5 4.0 38.7% 78.2% 32.2% 33.3% 20.0% 48.9% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 3/3 4.7 6.3 52.8% 75.4% 49.3% 81.9% 33.6% 63.1% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 117/161 6.8 2.9 54.1% 73.5% 44.8% 58.1% 38.7% 60.1% 35.9% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karsten Braasch Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1989 1512 108.2 — — — — — +30 — 40.0% -0.50 — 1–1 — -0.12 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69
22 1990 1494 90.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.23 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22
23 1991 1525 122.2 +0.23 +1.76 1.065 51.1% — +35 — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — -0.66 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26
24 1992 1529 123.0 -1.51 -1.07 0.872 47.3% -15 +52 +42 42.2% -0.59 4–8 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.17 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26
25 1993 1650 123.9 +0.46 -0.37 0.990 49.7% -38 -65 -99 48.7% -0.06 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) — -0.01 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11
26 1994 1598 136.2 -1.50 -2.51 0.857 47.3% +10 -51 +31 48.2% -0.26 6–11 (35%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.89 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08
27 1995 1592 124.3 +0.63 -1.52 0.891 48.4% +44 -65 — 43.6% -0.38 3–3 (50%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.15 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 1996 1577 98.7 -1.06 -0.26 0.962 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.01 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 1997 1619 119.2 +3.03 -0.42 1.120 52.0% +55 — — 43.8% -0.69 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 1998 1604 111.0 -0.84 -2.92 0.726 45.3% +42 — — 42.1% -0.53 1–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.53 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50
31 1999 1591 99.2 -2.35 -1.56 0.631 40.0% — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 1605 107.3 +1.41 +0.08 1.074 51.6% — — -2 57.1% +1.14 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1731 131.8 -0.54 -1.41 0.901 48.2% +6 -21 -4 45.4% -0.34 21–32 (40%) 32–35 (48%) 97.5 +0.26 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.