H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Kei Nishikori vs Rafael Nadal H2H: 1-12
Rafael Nadal holds a 12–1 lead over Kei Nishikori in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 6–0 on clay and 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2021 Barcelona fourth round 6-0 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Japan
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
12
13 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2021* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-0 2-6 6-2 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Jun 6, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-1 6-1 6-3 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2018* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-2 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2016* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 7-5 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Mar 18, 2016* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-3 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2015* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Kei Nishikori | 6-2 6-4 | Rafael Nadal | Match data |
| May 11, 2014* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 2-6 6-4 3-0 (ret.) | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(3) 7-5 7-6(3) | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-1 6-3 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2012* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-4 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2011* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 6-4 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Rafael Nadal | 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2008* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Rafael Nadal | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Kei Nishikori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kei Nishikori | #464 | #4 | 6,385 | 2,245 | 424 | 226 | 65.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kei Nishikori | Rafael Nadal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2007 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #286 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #418 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 |
| 20 | 2010 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,743 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 |
| 21 | 2011 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #25 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 |
| 22 | 2012 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #19 | 1,971 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 |
| 23 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #17 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 |
| 24 | 2014 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #5 | 2,211 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 |
| 25 | 2015 | 51–17 | 75.0% | #8 | 2,131 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 |
| 26 | 2016 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #5 | 2,151 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 |
| 27 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 2,067 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 |
| 28 | 2018 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,105 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 |
| 29 | 2019 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #13 | 2,001 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #41 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 |
| 31 | 2021 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #47 | 1,945 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #352 | 1,938 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 |
| 34 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #106 | 1,863 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 |