H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kelly Evernden vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 1-1
Kelly Evernden and Bill Scanlon are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kelly Evernden leads 1–0 on carpet, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bill Scanlon won the 1988 Queen's Club second round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1988* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Bill Scanlon | 7-5 7-6 | Kelly Evernden | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1988* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kelly Evernden | 6-4 7-6 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kelly Evernden | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |