H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kelly Evernden vs Broderick Dyke H2H: 2-0
Kelly Evernden holds a 2–0 lead over Broderick Dyke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kelly Evernden leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kelly Evernden won the 1989 Tokyo Outdoor third round 4-6 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1989* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kelly Evernden | 4-6 6-4 7-6 | Broderick Dyke | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1985* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kelly Evernden | 6-2 6-1 | Broderick Dyke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Broderick Dyke | #819 | #35 | 221 | 1,715 | 78 | 121 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kelly Evernden | Broderick Dyke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #179 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #66 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #113 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #171 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #752 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #696 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |