H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kelly Evernden vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-1
Kelly Evernden and Damir Keretic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay, while Kelly Evernden leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1987 Stuttgart Outdoor second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1987* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-2 6-3 | Kelly Evernden | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1987* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Kelly Evernden | 6-3 6-3 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kelly Evernden | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |