H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kelly Evernden vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-1
Kelly Evernden and Danie Visser are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kelly Evernden leads 1–0 on grass, while Danie Visser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kelly Evernden won the 1987 Wimbledon second round 6-2 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NZL
Age 64
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Kelly Evernden | 6-2 7-6 6-1 | Danie Visser | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1985* | Livingston | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Danie Visser | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Kelly Evernden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Evernden | #1,218 | #31 | 535 | 1,853 | 121 | 129 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kelly Evernden | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #403 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #576 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #86 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #289 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #119 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,615 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #193 | 1,512 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #207 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #447 | 1,580 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,570 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |