H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kelly Jones vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 0-1
Martin Wostenholme holds a 1–0 lead over Kelly Jones in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Wostenholme leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Wostenholme won the 1990 Canada Masters second round 4-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1990* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Martin Wostenholme | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Kelly Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Jones | #879 | #86 | 346 | 1,647 | 48 | 83 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kelly Jones | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #156 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #366 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #133 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #233 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #445 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #169 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |