H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Ken Flach vs Joel Bailey H2H: 1-0
Ken Flach holds a 1–0 lead over Joel Bailey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Flach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Flach won the 1985 Tokyo Outdoor second round 6-1 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1985* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Ken Flach | 6-1 3-6 6-4 | Joel Bailey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joel Bailey | #1,058 | #197 | 0 | 1,500 | 7 | 34 | 17.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ken Flach | Joel Bailey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #260 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #496 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #513 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #633 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |