H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ken Flach vs Paul Annacone H2H: 1-0
Ken Flach holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Flach leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Flach won the 1989 US Open first round 7-6 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ken Flach | 7-6 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ken Flach | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |