H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ken Flach vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 1-0
Ken Flach holds a 1–0 lead over Pavel Slozil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Flach leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ken Flach won the 1985 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-7 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ken Flach | 6-3 6-7 6-1 7-6 | Pavel Slozil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pavel Slozil | #550 | #12 | 0 | 1,790 | 142 | 160 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ken Flach | Pavel Slozil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #218 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #78 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #68 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #81 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #40 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |