H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ken Flach vs Robert Seguso H2H: 0-2
Robert Seguso holds a 2–0 lead over Ken Flach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robert Seguso leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robert Seguso won the 1989 Tokyo Outdoor second round 3-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1989* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Robert Seguso | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Ken Flach | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1984* | Taipei | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Robert Seguso | 7-6 3-6 6-4 | Ken Flach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Flach | #815 | #56 | 130 | 1,714 | 52 | 80 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robert Seguso | #773 | #22 | 242 | 1,885 | 86 | 90 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ken Flach | Robert Seguso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #314 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #321 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #155 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #209 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #223 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,843 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #100 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #203 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #37 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #194 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #367 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #818 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #514 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |