H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Ken Rosewall vs Milan Holecek H2H: 1-0
Ken Rosewall holds a 1–0 lead over Milan Holecek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1969 Roland Garros second round 6-0 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 82
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 6-0 6-3 6-1 | Milan Holecek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
| Milan Holecek | #322 | #71 | 0 | 1,721 | 116 | 157 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ken Rosewall | Milan Holecek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 13–7 | 65.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 27–28 | 49.1% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 21–31 | 40.4% | #87 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #90 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #102 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #225 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 44 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 45 | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |