H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Ken Rosewall vs Richard Gonzalez H2H: 10-5

Ken Rosewall holds a 10–5 lead over Richard Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Ken Rosewall leads 4–2 on carpet and 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1970 Wembley quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ken Rosewall
AUS Age 91 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
10 – 5
15 main-draw meetings
Richard Gonzalez
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ken Rosewall 6-2 6-3 Richard Gonzalez Match data Nov 21, 1970* QF Wembley ATP 250 Carpet
Ken Rosewall 6-0 10-8 6-2 Richard Gonzalez Match data Mar 21, 1970* QF Sydney International ATP 250 Grass
Richard Gonzalez 6-4 1-6 6-3 Ken Rosewall Match data Oct 11, 1969* QF Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Ken Rosewall 5-7 6-1 7-5 Richard Gonzalez Match data Oct 9, 1969* F Midland ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gonzalez 6-4 11-13 6-4 Ken Rosewall Match data Sep 24, 1969* R16 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gonzalez 6-4 6-4 7-5 Ken Rosewall Match data Aug 21, 1969 RR Baltimore ATP 250 Grass
Ken Rosewall 7-9 9-7 6-2 Richard Gonzalez Match data Jul 14, 1969* QF U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Carpet
Ken Rosewall 4-6 6-3 11-9 Richard Gonzalez Match data Feb 28, 1969* QF Oakland ATP 250 Carpet
Ken Rosewall 3-6 6-1 6-4 Richard Gonzalez Match data Dec 12, 1968* SF Nashville ATP 250 Carpet
Richard Gonzalez 7-5 5-7 6-4 Ken Rosewall Match data Dec 3, 1968* QF New York 3 ATP 250 Carpet
Ken Rosewall 11-9 6-2 Richard Gonzalez Match data Sep 19, 1968* QF Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Richard Gonzalez 8-6 1-6 7-5 Ken Rosewall Match data Jul 22, 1968* SF Los Angeles Ntl ATP 250 Carpet
Ken Rosewall 7-5 6-3 6-3 Richard Gonzalez Match data May 7, 1968* SF Wembley Ntl 2 ATP 250 Hard
Ken Rosewall 6-4 8-6 Richard Gonzalez Match data Apr 21, 1968* SF Paris Ntl ATP 250 Hard
Ken Rosewall 4-6 6-3 6-3 Richard Gonzalez Match data Apr 15, 1968* SF Hollywood Ntl ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ken Rosewall #255 #2 0 2,233 535 193 73.5% 4 0 0 1 34 39
Richard Gonzalez — — — 2,030 — — — 0 0 0 0 9 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Ken Rosewall Richard Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 45–12 78.9% — 1,854 1 4 — — — — — — —
1969 49–21 70.0% — 1,943 1 7 — — — — — — —
1970 72–21 77.4% — 2,086 2 13 — — — — — — —
1971 80–24 76.9% — 2,158 3 21 — — — — — — —
1972 61–15 80.3% — 2,117 4 28 — — — — — — —
1973 65–17 79.3% #6 2,106 4 33 — — — — — — —
1974 26–7 78.8% #9 2,114 4 33 — — — — — — —
1975 37–11 77.1% #6 1,998 4 36 — — — — — — —
1976 35–18 66.0% #13 1,978 4 38 — — — — — — —
1977 39–20 66.1% #11 1,981 4 39 — — — — — — —
1978 19–19 50.0% #34 1,809 4 39 — — — — — — —
1979 4–5 44.4% #207 1,747 4 39 — — — — — — —
1980 3–3 50.0% #255 1,747 4 39 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Ken Rosewall Richard Gonzalez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 17 3 20 85.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1968 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
1969 11 5 16 68.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 19 8 27 70.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 1969 12 4 16 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 10 12 22 45.5%
1970 15 8 23 65.2% 11 1 12 91.7% 25 2 27 92.6% 21 10 31 67.7% 1970 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
1971 22 6 28 78.6% 16 5 21 76.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 24 10 34 70.6% 1971 10 1 11 90.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
1972 23 5 28 82.1% 13 1 14 92.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 19 8 27 70.4% 1972 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
1973 14 4 18 77.8% 17 2 19 89.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 25 8 33 75.8% 1973 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
1974 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 9 5 14 64.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 12 5 17 70.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 6 3 9 66.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 156 56 212 73.6% 115 33 148 77.7% 133 38 171 77.8% 131 66 197 66.5% Career 48 27 75 64.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 32 18 50 64.0% 28 26 54 51.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Ken Rosewall Richard Gonzalez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1855 127.3 — — — — -37 -15 -122 72.6% +1.53 6–4 (60%) — — +0.08 1968 1694 115.5 — — — — -167 -49 -59 51.2% +0.16 8–7 (53%) — — -2.12
1969 1944 143.7 — — — — +58 -13 -84 64.8% +1.25 11–10 (52%) — — -2.55 1969 1958 138.2 — — — — -26 -295 -88 61.5% +0.72 12–7 (63%) — — -2.11
1970 2087 161.2 — — — — -35 -47 +195 72.2% +1.57 10–6 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 -3.59 1970 1938 138.5 — — — — +35 — -100 55.1% -0.12 6–5 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 100.8 -2.32
1971 2159 161.8 — — — — +91 -83 +112 73.0% +1.68 13–5 (72%) 11–9 (55%) 103.2 -5.10 1971 1935 130.2 — — — — +97 -289 -141 67.3% +1.15 4–1 (80%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.19
1972 2118 162.7 — — — — +62 +74 +120 74.4% +1.64 14–8 (64%) 14–8 (64%) 101.2 -2.93 1972 1837 121.3 — — — — +100 — -61 62.7% +0.64 6–2 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 101.7 +3.13
1973 2106 159.5 — — — — +10 +119 +57 74.3% +1.84 13–12 (52%) 11–9 (55%) 92.8 -2.08 1973 1815 122.6 — — — — +71 — -49 43.5% -0.83 2–1 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 104.0 -1.42
1974 2114 153.5 — — — — -17 — +148 68.8% +1.19 5–2 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 1998 149.9 — — — — +18 +205 +172 72.2% +1.56 9–3 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 96.0 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1976 1978 156.6 — — — — +69 +134 +115 63.2% +0.93 6–5 (55%) 9–0 (100%) 103.4 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1977 1982 157.9 — — — — +99 +50 +68 62.2% +0.78 11–10 (52%) 11–6 (65%) 99.0 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 1809 142.6 — — — — +145 +61 +178 51.1% +0.18 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1748 115.3 — — — — +136 — +221 52.4% -0.05 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1748 117.3 — — — — +115 — — 53.3% -0.33 1–2 (33%) — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2234 159.3 — — — — +43 +53 +84 69.0% +1.35 103–75 (58%) 74–52 (59%) 97.4 -2.57 Career 2031 133.8 — — — — -2 -105 -84 57.8% +0.39 38–23 (62%) 19–9 (68%) 111.0 -2.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.