H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Ken Rosewall vs Stan Smith H2H: 4-3

Ken Rosewall holds a 4–3 lead over Stan Smith in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Stan Smith leads 2–1 on carpet, while Ken Rosewall leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Stan Smith won the 1975 Hartford round robin 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ken Rosewall
AUS Age 91 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main-draw meetings
Stan Smith
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stan Smith 6-2 7-6 Ken Rosewall Match data Mar 6, 1975 RR Hartford ATP 250 Carpet
Ken Rosewall 6-8 4-6 9-8 6-1 6-3 Stan Smith Match data Jul 7, 1974* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ken Rosewall 6-7 6-0 6-4 Stan Smith Match data Mar 9, 1973 RR Hartford ATP 250 Carpet
Ken Rosewall 6-3 6-2 Stan Smith Match data Jul 22, 1971* SF Washington Open ATP 250 Clay
Stan Smith 6-4 6-5 Ken Rosewall Match data Dec 9, 1970 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Stan Smith 8-10 6-2 9-7 Ken Rosewall Match data Nov 6, 1970* SF Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Ken Rosewall 6-2 6-2 6-2 Stan Smith Match data Sep 13, 1970* QF US Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ken Rosewall #255 #2 0 2,232 535 193 73.5% 4 0 0 1 34 39
Stan Smith — — — 2,264 647 286 69.3% 2 0 1 1 44 48

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ken Rosewall Stan Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 — — — — — — — 1968 34–15 69.4% — 1,782 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 1969 54–14 79.4% — 1,966 0 9
23 — — — — — — — 1970 58–28 67.4% — 2,058 0 14
24 — — — — — — — 1971 58–15 79.5% — 2,027 1 20
25 — — — — — — — 1972 68–12 85.0% — 2,146 2 29
26 — — — — — — — 1973 72–21 77.4% — 2,055 2 37
27 — — — — — — — 1974 46–21 68.7% — 1,981 2 41
28 — — — — — — — 1975 32–18 64.0% — 1,887 2 42
29 — — — — — — — 1976 45–25 64.3% — 1,965 2 42
30 — — — — — — — 1977 50–24 67.6% — 1,879 2 43
31 — — — — — — — 1978 32–16 66.7% — 1,942 2 45
32 — — — — — — — 1979 40–19 67.8% — 1,936 2 47
33 1968 45–12 78.9% — 1,854 1 4 1980 25–19 56.8% — 1,852 2 48
34 1969 49–21 70.0% — 1,943 1 7 1981 23–15 60.5% — 1,876 2 48
35 1970 72–21 77.4% — 2,084 2 13 1982 6–11 35.3% — 1,740 2 48
36 1971 80–24 76.9% — 2,157 3 21 1983 4–11 26.7% — 1,610 2 48
37 1972 61–15 80.3% — 2,117 4 28 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,596 2 48
38 1973 65–17 79.3% #6 2,106 4 33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,592 2 48
39 1974 26–7 78.8% #9 2,114 4 33 — — — — — — —
40 1975 37–11 77.1% #6 1,998 4 36 — — — — — — —
41 1976 35–18 66.0% #13 1,978 4 38 — — — — — — —
42 1977 39–20 66.1% #11 1,981 4 39 — — — — — — —
43 1978 19–19 50.0% #34 1,809 4 39 — — — — — — —
44 1979 4–5 44.4% #207 1,747 4 39 — — — — — — —
45 1980 3–3 50.0% #255 1,747 4 39 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ken Rosewall Stan Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 20 5 25 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 20 4 24 83.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 19 3 22 86.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 25 9 34 73.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 8 5 13 61.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 21 1 22 95.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 29 1 30 96.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 15 3 18 83.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 14 7 21 66.7% 18 6 24 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 35 7 42 83.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 8 5 13 61.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 11 4 15 73.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 16 6 22 72.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 5 21 76.2%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 14 3 17 82.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 19 6 25 76.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
33 1968 17 3 20 85.0% 15 2 17 88.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
34 1969 11 5 16 68.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 19 8 27 70.4% 12 4 16 75.0% 1981 15 9 24 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
35 1970 15 8 23 65.2% 11 1 12 91.7% 25 2 27 92.6% 21 10 31 67.7% 1982 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 1971 22 6 28 78.6% 16 5 21 76.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 24 10 34 70.6% 1983 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 1972 23 5 28 82.1% 13 1 14 92.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 19 8 27 70.4% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1973 14 4 18 77.8% 17 2 19 89.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 25 8 33 75.8% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1974 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1975 9 5 14 64.3% 19 3 22 86.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1976 12 5 17 70.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1977 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1978 6 3 9 66.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 1979 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 156 56 212 73.6% 115 33 148 77.7% 133 38 171 77.8% 131 66 197 66.5% — 230 98 328 70.1% 125 67 192 65.1% 123 45 168 73.2% 169 76 245 69.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ken Rosewall Stan Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1782 134.1 — — — — +134 -224 -88 63.9% +1.07 6–5 (55%) — — -1.70
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1966 138.8 — — — — +101 -292 +56 70.1% +1.23 14–7 (67%) — — -0.07
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 2058 145.9 — — — — +112 -306 -99 65.3% +0.87 15–8 (65%) 5–4 (56%) 104.7 -0.14
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2028 155.0 — — — — +9 -55 +178 73.0% +1.34 8–5 (62%) 16–8 (67%) 106.1 -2.39
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2146 152.4 — — — — +112 -186 +66 72.3% +1.38 19–3 (86%) 10–11 (48%) 103.5 +0.17
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2056 163.3 — — — — +108 -47 +160 70.5% +1.32 19–9 (68%) 16–16 (50%) 100.2 -2.48
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1981 153.7 — — — — +83 -47 +263 61.9% +0.81 18–11 (62%) 10–13 (43%) 94.5 -3.16
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1887 144.9 — — — — +183 -28 +198 57.0% +0.57 10–4 (71%) 8–10 (44%) 102.3 -0.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1965 158.8 — — — — +106 -108 +87 59.6% +0.74 13–10 (57%) 12–9 (57%) 101.0 -5.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1880 150.6 — — — — +138 -41 +147 61.8% +0.70 17–9 (65%) 14–8 (64%) 102.3 -1.48
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1943 148.5 — — — — +108 -163 — 59.5% +0.45 10–4 (71%) 16–4 (80%) 110.4 -0.83
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1936 153.2 — — — — +73 -110 +33 66.0% +1.15 6–6 (50%) 13–9 (59%) 97.5 -1.38
33 1968 1855 127.3 — — — — -37 -15 -123 72.6% +1.53 6–4 (60%) — — +0.09 1980 1852 151.0 — — — — +10 — +148 54.2% +0.54 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 97.3 -2.59
34 1969 1944 143.7 — — — — +58 -13 -84 64.8% +1.25 11–10 (52%) — — -2.55 1981 1876 149.7 — — — — +5 — +98 56.7% +0.20 10–4 (71%) 10–8 (56%) 102.1 -3.66
35 1970 2085 161.2 — — — — -35 -42 +194 72.2% +1.57 10–6 (63%) 5–3 (63%) 104.1 -3.60 1982 1740 123.3 — — — — +11 — +185 42.2% -0.33 0–5 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 87.6 -0.62
36 1971 2158 161.6 — — — — +91 -81 +113 73.0% +1.68 13–5 (72%) 11–9 (55%) 103.2 -5.10 1983 1611 125.0 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 96.9 -0.40
37 1972 2117 162.6 — — — — +63 +75 +120 74.4% +1.64 14–8 (64%) 14–8 (64%) 101.2 -2.92 1984 1597 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
38 1973 2106 159.5 — — — — +10 +120 +58 74.3% +1.84 13–12 (52%) 11–9 (55%) 92.9 -2.08 1985 1592 104.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.31
39 1974 2114 153.5 — — — — -17 — +148 68.8% +1.19 5–2 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 100.3 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1975 1998 149.8 — — — — +18 +204 +172 72.2% +1.56 9–3 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 96.0 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1976 1978 156.5 — — — — +69 +133 +115 63.2% +0.93 6–5 (55%) 9–0 (100%) 103.4 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1977 1982 157.9 — — — — +99 +49 +68 62.2% +0.78 11–10 (52%) 11–6 (65%) 99.0 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1978 1809 142.5 — — — — +145 +61 +178 51.1% +0.18 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
44 1979 1748 115.3 — — — — +135 — +221 52.4% -0.05 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
45 1980 1748 117.3 — — — — +116 — — 53.3% -0.33 1–2 (33%) — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2233 159.2 — — — — +44 +54 +83 69.0% +1.35 103–75 (58%) 74–52 (59%) 97.4 -2.57 — 2265 156.0 — — — — +94 -112 +90 63.9% +0.90 174–100 (64%) 140–120 (54%) 102.4 -2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.