H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 5-2

Kenneth Carlsen holds a 5–2 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Kenneth Carlsen leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Sebastien Lareau leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 1999 Singapore third round 6-4 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 14, 1999* Singapore ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #81 6-4 3-6 6-2 Sebastien Lareau #98 Match data
Jul 8, 1999* Newport ATP 250 R32 Grass Kenneth Carlsen #109 6-4 6-2 Sebastien Lareau #100 Match data
Jul 24, 1997* Los Angeles ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #100 7-6(4) 6-1 Sebastien Lareau #120 Match data
Jul 18, 1996* Washington ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #73 6-3 6-3 Sebastien Lareau #112 Match data
Jan 17, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sebastien Lareau #126 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-4 7-5 Kenneth Carlsen #82 Match data
Mar 9, 1995* Copenhagen ATP 250 R32 Carpet Sebastien Lareau #99 7-6(5) 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #81 Match data
Jan 6, 1994* Adelaide ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #92 6-2 7-6(2) Sebastien Lareau #131 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,719 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,567 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 1996 15–14 51.7% #105 1,679 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 4–10 28.6% #124 1,586 0 0
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,516 0 0
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 — — — — — — —