H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kevin Anderson vs Robin Haase H2H: 1-0
Kevin Anderson holds a 1–0 lead over Robin Haase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kevin Anderson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Anderson won the 2016 Auckland fourth round 7-6(8) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 40
Right-Handed
203 cm / 6'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kevin Anderson | 7-6(8) 7-6(5) | Robin Haase | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Robin Haase | 6-1 6-7(7) 6-4 | Kevin Anderson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Anderson | #1,151 | #5 | 4,845 | 2,142 | 347 | 251 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Robin Haase | #1,206 | #33 | 1,220 | 1,860 | 202 | 255 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kevin Anderson | Robin Haase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #114 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #116 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #104 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #65 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #61 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #32 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #56 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2012 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #37 | 1,859 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #83 | 1,715 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,958 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #66 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #12 | 2,046 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #59 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #67 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #42 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #14 | 1,974 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #50 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #6 | 2,123 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #162 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2019 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #91 | 2,057 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,661 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #81 | 1,964 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2021 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #104 | 1,681 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #756 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #627 | 1,669 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |