H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Kevin Curren vs Dan Goldie H2H: 1-1

Kevin Curren and Dan Goldie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dan Goldie leads 1–0 on carpet, while Kevin Curren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dan Goldie won the 1987 San Francisco round of 16 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kevin Curren
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Dan Goldie
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dan Goldie #72 7-6 7-6 Kevin Curren #29 Match data Oct 2, 1987* R16 San Francisco ATP 250 Carpet
Kevin Curren #26 3-6 7-5 6-2 Dan Goldie #75 Match data Sep 24, 1987* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kevin Curren #1,179 #5 684 2,088 339 238 58.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Dan Goldie #738 #27 457 1,855 122 117 51.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kevin Curren Dan Goldie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1978 1–2 33.3% #91 1,510 0 0 1984 7–4 63.6% #101 1,615 0 0
21 1979 7–14 33.3% #197 1,550 0 0 1985 3–9 25.0% #265 1,603 0 0
22 1980 16–13 55.2% #55 1,770 0 0 1986 8–10 44.4% #113 1,658 0 0
23 1981 23–18 56.1% #50 1,768 0 1 1987 24–19 55.8% #50 1,765 0 1
24 1982 33–17 66.0% #17 1,944 0 2 1988 36–19 65.5% #29 1,800 0 2
25 1983 32–20 61.5% #9 1,932 0 2 1989 12–14 46.2% #67 1,735 0 2
26 1984 32–17 65.3% #15 1,958 0 2 1990 24–26 48.0% #96 1,658 0 2
27 1985 25–13 65.8% #10 1,917 0 3 1991 8–15 34.8% #181 1,574 0 2
28 1986 35–17 67.3% #18 1,892 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1987 21–17 55.3% #37 1,808 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 1988 31–15 67.4% #23 1,812 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1989 33–18 64.7% #20 1,830 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 1990 20–19 51.3% #71 1,798 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 1991 18–20 47.4% #58 1,701 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 1992 12–17 41.4% #147 1,659 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,637 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kevin Curren Dan Goldie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1978 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1979 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1980 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1981 13 8 21 61.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1987 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 11 30 63.3% 1988 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 1989 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1984 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 1990 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1986 16 8 24 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 17 6 23 73.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 145 110 255 56.9% 8 16 24 33.3% 71 36 107 66.4% 115 76 191 60.2% — 79 69 148 53.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 19 16 35 54.3% 20 20 40 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kevin Curren Dan Goldie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1494 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.14
20 1978 1510 108.2 — — — — +45 — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.02 1984 1616 132.0 — — — — -12 -15 — 59.3% +0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.33
21 1979 1550 117.1 — — — — +10 — — 40.0% -0.72 1–5 (17%) 6–2 (75%) 100.2 +0.18 1985 1603 117.3 — — — — +16 -57 — 34.5% -0.90 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
22 1980 1770 143.7 — — — — -96 — 0 54.9% +0.44 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) 101.4 -0.62 1986 1658 131.7 — — — — +38 -102 — 43.1% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -0.61
23 1981 1768 137.7 — — — — -11 -234 -8 55.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -0.60 1987 1765 144.5 — — — — -2 — -38 52.1% +0.15 11–6 (65%) 10–6 (63%) 110.6 -2.01
24 1982 1945 163.2 — — — — -10 — -133 62.7% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) 100.7 -5.36 1988 1801 136.5 — — — — +24 — -130 57.8% +0.35 17–6 (74%) 10–6 (63%) 108.7 -0.07
25 1983 1933 158.2 — — — — -9 -409 +67 61.0% +0.59 4–7 (36%) 14–10 (58%) 99.7 -3.15 1989 1735 130.2 — — — — -17 -245 +91 47.8% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 100.2 -0.95
26 1984 1959 146.2 — — — — -46 — +79 59.9% +0.51 11–5 (69%) 13–11 (54%) 102.6 +0.12 1990 1658 132.5 — — — — +19 — +189 50.4% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 8–10 (44%) 95.1 +1.16
27 1985 1918 150.2 — — — — -82 — +233 67.4% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 13–11 (54%) 92.3 -0.51 1991 1575 122.7 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +54 — +181 35.6% -0.95 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 99.4 -1.05
28 1986 1893 151.4 — — — — +28 — +158 63.8% +0.73 9–8 (53%) 20–14 (59%) 98.3 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1987 1809 144.7 — — — — +41 — +158 53.9% +0.32 6–5 (55%) 9–13 (41%) 95.6 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 1813 143.0 — — — — +19 — +62 61.9% +0.75 13–6 (68%) 11–10 (52%) 101.7 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 1831 149.5 — — — — +48 — +1 61.7% +0.93 12–10 (55%) 13–9 (59%) 98.4 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1990 1798 141.4 — — — — -9 -239 +65 52.4% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 12–11 (52%) 99.8 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 1702 140.1 +1.54 -1.53 0.983 49.8% 0 — +133 48.0% +0.04 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 95.6 -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 1660 128.6 +0.39 -1.70 0.925 48.5% +15 — +118 45.1% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 1–8 (11%) 89.5 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1993 1638 94.8 -1.10 -2.26 0.501 33.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2088 153.7 +1.04 -1.61 0.946 49.0% -1 -299 +63 57.4% +0.47 97–90 (52%) 145–140 (51%) 95.6 -2.59 — 1856 140.1 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +18 -98 +41 49.7% -0.08 53–37 (59%) 52–45 (54%) 107.4 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.