H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kevin Curren vs Leif Shiras H2H: 1-1
Kevin Curren and Leif Shiras are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kevin Curren leads 1–0 on carpet, while Leif Shiras leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leif Shiras won the 1989 Wimbledon third round 4-6 6-3 5-7 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Leif Shiras | 4-6 6-3 5-7 7-6 6-3 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1989* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kevin Curren | 4-1 (ret.) | Leif Shiras | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Leif Shiras | #1,118 | #31 | 291 | 1,687 | 71 | 102 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kevin Curren | Leif Shiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #408 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #123 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |