H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kevin Curren vs Peter Doohan H2H: 1-1

Kevin Curren and Peter Doohan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on grass, while Kevin Curren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Curren won the 1992 Memphis round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kevin Curren
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Peter Doohan
AUS Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kevin Curren #68 6-2 6-4 Peter Doohan Match data Feb 12, 1992* R64 Memphis ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Peter Doohan #289 4-6 6-3 6-4 6-4 Kevin Curren #18 Match data Jan 18, 1987* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kevin Curren #1,179 #5 684 2,088 339 238 58.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Peter Doohan #1,102 #43 140 1,737 50 82 37.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kevin Curren Peter Doohan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% #480 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,493 0 0
20 1978 1–2 33.3% #91 1,510 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
21 1979 7–14 33.3% #197 1,550 0 0 1982 3–3 50.0% — 1,505 0 0
22 1980 16–13 55.2% #55 1,770 0 0 1983 1–2 33.3% #363 1,501 0 0
23 1981 23–18 56.1% #50 1,768 0 1 1984 10–9 52.6% #85 1,613 0 1
24 1982 33–17 66.0% #17 1,944 0 2 1985 18–19 48.6% #101 1,682 0 1
25 1983 32–20 61.5% #9 1,932 0 2 1986 0–7 0.0% #301 1,555 0 1
26 1984 32–17 65.3% #15 1,958 0 2 1987 12–15 44.4% #72 1,619 0 1
27 1985 25–13 65.8% #10 1,917 0 3 1988 4–13 23.5% #187 1,485 0 1
28 1986 35–17 67.3% #18 1,892 0 4 1989 1–5 16.7% #172 1,451 0 1
29 1987 21–17 55.3% #37 1,808 0 4 1990 0–2 0.0% #331 1,435 0 1
30 1988 31–15 67.4% #23 1,812 0 4 1991 0–1 0.0% #1131 1,427 0 1
31 1989 33–18 64.7% #20 1,830 0 5 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,421 0 1
32 1990 20–19 51.3% #71 1,798 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 1991 18–20 47.4% #58 1,701 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 1992 12–17 41.4% #147 1,659 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,637 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kevin Curren Peter Doohan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1978 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1979 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 1980 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 1981 13 8 21 61.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
24 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 11 30 63.3% 1985 4 9 13 30.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 10 25 60.0% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 1984 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 13 10 23 56.5% 1987 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1988 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
28 1986 16 8 24 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 17 6 23 73.9% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1987 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1988 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1989 19 10 29 65.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 145 110 255 56.9% 8 16 24 33.3% 71 36 107 66.4% 115 76 191 60.2% — 8 37 45 17.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 38 35 73 52.1% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kevin Curren Peter Doohan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1494 102.1 — — — — — — +22 25.0% -1.63 1–0 0–1 — +0.01
20 1978 1510 108.2 — — — — +45 — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.02 1981 1485 113.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.30
21 1979 1550 117.1 — — — — +10 — — 40.0% -0.72 1–5 (17%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.18 1982 1506 112.2 — — — — — — +15 46.2% +0.23 — 1–4 (20%) — +0.42
22 1980 1770 143.7 — — — — -96 — 0 54.9% +0.44 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.62 1983 1501 111.3 — — — — — — +33 28.6% 0.00 — 0–2 — +0.19
23 1981 1768 137.7 — — — — -11 -234 -8 55.1% +0.31 7–6 (54%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.60 1984 1614 118.7 — — — — -73 -99 +60 53.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.08
24 1982 1945 163.2 — — — — -10 — -133 62.7% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 5–9 (36%) — -5.36 1985 1683 129.4 — — — — -157 -162 +79 51.2% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.42
25 1983 1933 158.2 — — — — -9 -409 +67 61.0% +0.59 4–7 (36%) 14–10 (58%) — -3.15 1986 1555 90.8 — — — — — -80 — 0.0% -3.09 — 0–1 — +0.41
26 1984 1959 146.2 — — — — -46 — +79 59.9% +0.51 11–5 (69%) 13–11 (54%) — +0.12 1987 1619 131.2 — — — — -147 — +163 45.6% -0.29 5–5 (50%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.16
27 1985 1918 150.2 — — — — -82 — +233 67.4% +0.87 2–5 (29%) 13–11 (54%) — -0.51 1988 1485 100.1 — — — — -71 — +180 31.0% -1.17 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.01
28 1986 1893 151.4 — — — — +28 — +158 63.8% +0.73 9–8 (53%) 20–14 (59%) — -0.41 1989 1451 100.7 — — — — -54 — — 14.3% -1.78 1–0 0–1 — +0.50
29 1987 1809 144.7 — — — — +41 — +158 53.9% +0.32 6–5 (55%) 9–13 (41%) — -1.25 1990 1435 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.40 — — — -0.10
30 1988 1813 143.0 — — — — +19 — +62 61.9% +0.75 13–6 (68%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.26 1991 1428 101.8 +1.97 -1.36 0.654 44.9% — — — 0.0% -1.67 — 0–1 — -0.04
31 1989 1831 149.5 — — — — +48 — +1 61.7% +0.93 12–10 (55%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.21 1992 1422 100.9 -2.70 -1.59 0.421 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
32 1990 1798 141.4 — — — — -9 -239 +65 52.4% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 12–11 (52%) — -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1991 1702 140.1 +1.54 -1.53 0.983 49.8% 0 — +133 48.0% +0.04 9–9 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — -2.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1992 1660 128.6 +0.39 -1.70 0.925 48.5% +15 — +118 45.1% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 1–8 (11%) — -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1993 1638 94.8 -1.10 -2.26 0.501 33.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2088 153.7 +1.04 -1.61 0.946 49.0% -1 -299 +63 57.4% +0.47 97–90 (52%) 145–140 (51%) 95.6 -2.59 — 1738 123.6 -0.37 -1.48 0.532 41.9% -114 -112 +99 40.4% -0.57 13–21 (38%) 23–31 (43%) 93.6 +2.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.