H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kevin Curren vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-0
Kevin Curren holds a 1–0 lead over Roscoe Tanner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kevin Curren leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kevin Curren won the 1981 Queen's Club fourth round 6-7 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1981* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Kevin Curren | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kevin Curren | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |
| 34 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |