H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Bruce Manson H2H: 2-0

Kim Warwick holds a 2–0 lead over Bruce Manson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1976 Salisbury round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Bruce Manson
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick 6-4 6-2 Bruce Manson Match data Feb 17, 1976* R32 Salisbury ATP 250 Carpet
Kim Warwick #39 6-4 4-6 6-4 Bruce Manson #281 Match data Jan 31, 1975* R16 Richmond-Wct ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Bruce Manson #597 #39 0 1,838 129 171 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Bruce Manson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1974 1–2 33.3% #274 1,475 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1975 1–6 14.3% #187 1,443 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1976 3–6 33.3% #215 1,454 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1977 7–15 31.8% #197 1,478 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1978 12–17 41.4% #105 1,587 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1979 24–27 47.1% #80 1,733 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1980 24–25 49.0% #83 1,694 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1981 24–22 52.2% #43 1,803 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1982 21–28 42.9% #75 1,692 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1983 4–10 28.6% #98 1,647 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1984 7–11 38.9% #135 1,621 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1985 0–1 0.0% #388 1,615 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Bruce Manson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1978 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1979 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 10 19 47.4%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 12 9 21 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1982 10 11 21 47.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 52 61 113 46.0% 35 46 81 43.2% 7 14 21 33.3% 35 50 85 41.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Bruce Manson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1973 1504 100.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.09
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1974 1475 97.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1975 1443 106.8 — — — — +72 — — 14.3% -2.21 0–2 — — -0.33
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1976 1455 108.5 — — — — — +69 — 23.5% -1.94 1–0 1–1 — -0.06
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1977 1478 118.7 — — — — -8 +38 — 39.2% -0.39 1–8 (11%) 2–9 (18%) — +1.25
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1978 1587 132.7 — — — — -48 +15 — 44.1% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 1–8 (11%) — +0.01
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1979 1733 143.1 — — — — -33 -106 -191 47.5% -0.07 11–10 (52%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.86
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1980 1695 139.0 — — — — -45 -7 -63 51.2% +0.09 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.41
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1981 1803 150.6 — — — — -6 -79 — 51.3% +0.14 8–7 (53%) 12–9 (57%) — -2.08
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1982 1693 141.9 — — — — -11 +54 — 42.6% -0.42 7–6 (54%) 6–13 (32%) — -3.40
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1983 1648 120.0 — — — — +17 +26 — 37.2% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1984 1621 121.4 — — — — +38 +30 — 41.5% -0.73 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.76
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1985 1616 102.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.26
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1838 142.4 — — — — -17 0 -134 44.6% -0.29 44–56 (44%) 47–70 (40%) 94.8 -2.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.