H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Butch Walts H2H: 3-1

Kim Warwick holds a 3–1 lead over Butch Walts in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1978 Los Angeles Open round of 64 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Butch Walts
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #43 6-1 6-2 Butch Walts #45 Match data Sep 20, 1978* R64 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Carpet
Kim Warwick #45 6-3 2-6 6-0 Butch Walts #52 Match data Oct 27, 1977* R32 Perth ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick #39 6-2 6-1 Butch Walts #57 Match data Oct 14, 1977* R16 Brisbane International ATP 250 Grass
Butch Walts 6-4 3-6 6-1 Kim Warwick Match data Oct 28, 1976* R32 Perth ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Butch Walts #755 #30 0 1,915 140 135 50.9% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Butch Walts
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1975 0–3 0.0% #396 1,482 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1976 16–13 55.2% #79 1,667 0 1
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1977 21–19 52.5% #50 1,760 0 2
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1978 13–20 39.4% #116 1,661 0 2
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1979 40–22 64.5% #39 1,870 0 4
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1980 22–23 48.9% #47 1,808 0 4
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1981 15–17 46.9% #85 1,707 0 4
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1982 3–5 37.5% #99 1,681 0 4
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1983 9–10 47.4% #473 1,679 0 4
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1984 1–3 25.0% #311 1,658 0 4
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Butch Walts
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1977 2 6 8 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1978 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 11 13 15.4%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1979 19 11 30 63.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 18 6 24 75.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 12 22 45.5%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 56 50 106 52.8% 13 20 33 39.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 62 54 116 53.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Butch Walts
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1975 1483 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — 0.00
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1976 1668 134.5 — — — — +66 — — 52.9% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.37
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1977 1760 136.6 — — — — +14 -163 -178 51.5% -0.20 7–7 (50%) 10–3 (77%) — +0.08
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1978 1661 120.5 — — — — +38 -90 — 41.0% -0.82 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +2.44
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1979 1871 154.6 — — — — +71 -274 — 60.0% +0.68 15–7 (68%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.43
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1980 1808 150.4 — — — — +41 -210 -193 49.5% -0.08 4–7 (36%) 8–8 (50%) — -4.84
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1981 1708 135.2 — — — — +45 -82 — 46.3% -0.18 7–7 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.04
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1982 1681 118.9 — — — — +33 — — 36.8% -1.16 1–0 1–0 — -0.15
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1983 1680 127.1 — — — — +24 — — 45.7% -0.04 5–3 (63%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.79
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1984 1659 107.4 — — — — +24 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 1–1 — -0.15
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1915 145.5 — — — — +47 -172 -183 50.0% -0.09 49–40 (55%) 58–49 (54%) 105.5 -0.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.