H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Cliff Drysdale H2H: 2-1
Kim Warwick holds a 2–1 lead over Cliff Drysdale in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1979 Brisbane fourth round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 85
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 1979* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Kim Warwick | 7-6 6-2 | Cliff Drysdale | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1976* | Johannesburg Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Cliff Drysdale | 6-3 1-0 (ret.) | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1974* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kim Warwick | 6-3 6-4 | Cliff Drysdale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cliff Drysdale | #423 | #13 | 0 | 2,134 | 402 | 253 | 61.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Cliff Drysdale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 53–37 | 58.9% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 45–25 | 64.3% | — | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 76–29 | 72.4% | — | 1,997 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 51–29 | 63.8% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #18 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #36 | 1,827 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #47 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #217 | 1,710 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,707 | 0 | 8 |