H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Cliff Letcher H2H: 2-1

Kim Warwick holds a 2–1 lead over Cliff Letcher in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cliff Letcher won the 1979 Wimbledon round of 128 7-6 6-1 2-6 7-6.

AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
AUS Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cliff Letcher 7-6 6-1 2-6 7-6 Kim Warwick #51 Match data Jun 27, 1979* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Kim Warwick 6-4 6-3 Cliff Letcher Match data Oct 22, 1976* R16 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick 6-4 6-2 Cliff Letcher Match data Oct 14, 1976* R32 Brisbane International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 268 51.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Cliff Letcher — — — 1,667 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Cliff Letcher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–21 34.4% #108 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Cliff Letcher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1970 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1971 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1973 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1975 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1976 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 73 153 52.3% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 7 19 26 26.9% 13 37 50 26.0% 29 39 68 42.6% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Cliff Letcher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1970 1468 93.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.39
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 1971 1466 93.6 — — — — — — +40 38.5% -1.39 — 1–1 — +0.70
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1972 1432 101.7 — — — — — — +52 41.2% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 +0.74
21 1973 1568 115.6 — — — — -68 -6 +8 43.1% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.49 1973 1507 107.4 — — — — — — +16 50.0% -0.06 1–0 1–1 — +0.05
22 1974 1719 135.2 — — — — +34 — -72 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.07 1974 1544 117.4 — — — — — — +6 44.4% +0.28 2–0 0–4 (0%) — +0.23
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -43 -121 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1975 1516 113.9 — — — — -9 +19 +24 34.6% -0.96 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — +0.15
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 0.00 1976 1489 120.5 — — — — -13 +55 — 32.6% -1.00 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +0.96
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1977 1634 129.2 — — — — -127 -120 -2 44.3% -0.35 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.86
26 1978 1790 148.1 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1978 1571 124.3 — — — — -45 -51 +45 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.75
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1979 1556 113.4 — — — — — -57 +54 45.9% -0.11 1–4 (20%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.68
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1980 1539 106.3 — — — — -18 — +64 39.4% -0.88 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.30
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1981 1570 105.2 — — — — — — +103 40.7% -1.07 2–0 4–0 (100%) — +1.23
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +24 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 1982 1467 96.5 — — — — +3 -52 +146 22.7% -1.77 0–2 0–1 — +1.08
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.7 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.6% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.90 — 1667 120.8 — — — — -35 -45 +46 38.2% -0.81 20–28 (42%) 21–19 (53%) 100.4 +5.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.