H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Eliot Teltscher H2H: 0-3

Eliot Teltscher holds a 3–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eliot Teltscher leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eliot Teltscher won the 1980 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 5-7 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Eliot Teltscher
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eliot Teltscher #20 6-4 5-7 6-4 7-6 Kim Warwick #57 Match data May 30, 1980* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Eliot Teltscher #23 6-2 6-4 Kim Warwick #60 Match data Aug 9, 1979* R32 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Eliot Teltscher 6-4 6-4 Kim Warwick Match data Aug 18, 1978* R16 Stowe ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Eliot Teltscher #1,093 #6 15 2,093 392 207 65.4% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Eliot Teltscher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1976 1–1 50.0% #239 1,503 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1977 9–14 39.1% #95 1,535 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1978 24–18 57.1% #42 1,753 0 1
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1979 42–25 62.7% #25 1,851 0 2
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1980 71–27 72.4% #10 1,977 0 4
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1981 54–19 74.0% #8 2,055 0 6
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1982 38–18 67.9% #14 1,908 0 6
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1983 43–19 69.4% #13 1,929 0 7
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1984 42–19 68.9% #8 1,989 0 9
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1985 19–12 61.3% #24 1,832 0 9
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1986 13–11 54.2% #53 1,798 0 9
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1987 24–13 64.9% #20 1,841 0 10
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1988 11–9 55.0% #138 1,718 0 10
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,695 0 10
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Eliot Teltscher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1977 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1978 15 7 22 68.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 4 8 12 33.3%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1979 19 9 28 67.9% 16 9 25 64.0% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 17 4 21 81.0% 27 10 37 73.0% — — — — 27 13 40 67.5%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1981 24 5 29 82.8% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 18 8 26 69.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1983 18 6 24 75.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 19 6 25 76.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 19 8 27 70.4%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1985 6 3 9 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 14 7 21 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 161 69 230 70.0% 118 66 184 64.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 107 66 173 61.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Eliot Teltscher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1976 1504 104.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.46
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1977 1536 117.0 — — — — +77 -37 -20 38.5% -0.71 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.84
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1978 1753 143.7 — — — — +29 -172 — 56.6% +0.76 9–7 (56%) 2–8 (20%) — +2.68
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1979 1851 154.6 — — — — +26 -72 — 57.4% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -3.43
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1980 1978 160.5 — — — — +24 -59 — 67.7% +1.30 15–11 (58%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.55
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1981 2056 165.2 — — — — +86 -119 — 69.6% +1.37 13–7 (65%) 7–6 (54%) — -3.60
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1982 1908 154.7 — — — — +84 +10 — 65.4% +1.01 6–9 (40%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.77
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1983 1929 154.5 — — — — +69 -39 -274 61.6% +0.98 14–2 (88%) 11–15 (42%) — -0.44
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1984 1990 156.3 — — — — +52 -164 — 64.8% +1.04 8–8 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — -0.79
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1985 1833 139.0 — — — — +91 -69 — 58.3% +0.33 7–6 (54%) 9–5 (64%) — +1.47
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1986 1799 140.4 — — — — +83 -20 — 50.8% +0.33 5–1 (83%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.98
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1987 1841 145.9 — — — — +79 -83 — 60.2% +0.86 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.10
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1988 1718 115.7 — — — — +65 — — 58.5% +0.54 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +2.12
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1990 1696 107.4 — — — — +55 — — 37.5% -0.62 1–1 0–1 — -0.08
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 2094 157.9 — — — — +58 -67 -133 61.6% +0.88 102–71 (59%) 75–79 (49%) 99.5 -0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.