H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 1-0

Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1979 Dayton round of 32 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Francisco Gonzalez
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick 6-4 7-6 Francisco Gonzalez Match data Mar 29, 1979* R32 Dayton ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Francisco Gonzalez #997 #40 0 1,758 105 157 40.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Francisco Gonzalez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1975 0–2 0.0% #308 1,486 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1976 0–3 0.0% #272 1,455 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1977 4–6 40.0% #281 1,499 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1978 8–10 44.4% #61 1,602 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1979 21–26 44.7% #77 1,649 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1980 12–20 37.5% #74 1,704 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1981 12–15 44.4% #98 1,659 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1982 14–19 42.4% #100 1,685 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1983 11–16 40.7% #99 1,623 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1984 14–17 45.2% #82 1,654 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1985 9–17 34.6% #140 1,533 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1986 0–6 0.0% #548 1,470 0 0
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Francisco Gonzalez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1978 0 3 3 0.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1979 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1980 11 9 20 55.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1983 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 44 62 106 41.5% 26 43 69 37.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 19 28 47 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Francisco Gonzalez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1975 1487 102.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 0–2 — -0.09
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1976 1455 101.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 0–2 0–1 — +0.16
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1977 1500 113.8 — — — — +54 +17 — 39.1% -1.61 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.31
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1978 1602 128.6 — — — — -59 +21 — 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.22
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1979 1650 132.9 — — — — +20 -50 -143 44.3% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.49
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1980 1704 136.2 — — — — +18 -124 -228 40.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -2.51
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1981 1659 126.6 — — — — +2 -100 -75 48.6% -0.11 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.46
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1982 1686 129.7 — — — — -33 -103 -85 46.4% -0.12 3–7 (30%) 11–12 (48%) — +0.29
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1983 1624 126.5 — — — — +5 -83 — 37.7% -0.84 4–0 (100%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.17
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1984 1655 132.0 — — — — -20 -90 +1 46.9% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.36
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1985 1533 120.3 — — — — +42 — +57 39.1% -0.35 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.77
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1986 1470 107.8 — — — — +29 — — 13.3% -2.07 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.28
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1759 134.8 — — — — +8 -53 -47 42.2% -0.47 34–40 (46%) 53–60 (47%) 102.8 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.