H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Geoff Masters H2H: 4-5

Geoff Masters holds a 5–4 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Geoff Masters leads 2–1 on carpet, while Kim Warwick leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Geoff Masters won the 1978 Japan Open round of 16 6-4 6-3.

AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Geoff Masters #53 6-4 6-3 Kim Warwick #43 Match data Oct 27, 1978* R16 Japan Open ATP 250 Clay
Geoff Masters #82 6-4 7-6 Kim Warwick #41 Match data Feb 23, 1978* R32 Denver ATP 250 Carpet
Geoff Masters #92 6-1 2-0 (ret.) Kim Warwick #45 Match data Oct 28, 1977* R16 Perth ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick #39 6-4 6-2 Geoff Masters #53 Match data Oct 13, 1977* R32 Brisbane International ATP 250 Grass
Kim Warwick #54 6-2 6-2 6-3 Geoff Masters #55 Match data Jun 22, 1977* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Kim Warwick 6-3 4-6 7-6 Geoff Masters Match data Apr 21, 1977* R32 Denver ATP 250 Carpet
Geoff Masters #56 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Kim Warwick #66 Match data Mar 2, 1977* R64 Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Geoff Masters 7-6 6-1 Kim Warwick Match data Oct 23, 1976* QF Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick #68 7-5 6-4 6-4 Geoff Masters #53 Match data Jun 25, 1976* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Geoff Masters #826 #42 0 1,889 237 253 48.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Geoff Masters
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0 1968 2–2 50.0% 1,511 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% 1,468 0 0 1969 7–6 53.8% 1,542 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% 1,463 0 0 1970 10–7 58.8% 1,581 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% 1,566 0 0 1971 19–22 46.3% 1,573 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1972 18–18 50.0% 1,670 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1973 28–23 54.9% #52 1,756 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1974 23–21 52.3% #53 1,766 0 1
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1975 27–24 52.9% #44 1,812 0 1
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1976 27–31 46.6% #53 1,780 0 2
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1977 22–27 44.9% #83 1,662 0 2
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1978 20–20 50.0% #59 1,701 0 2
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1979 21–23 47.7% #62 1,728 0 2
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1980 13–28 31.7% #166 1,517 0 2
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,501 0 2
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Geoff Masters
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1968 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1969 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1970 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1971 3 9 12 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 11 7 18 61.1%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 11 5 16 68.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1973 8 4 12 66.7% 15 13 28 53.6% 5 6 11 45.5%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 2 8 10 20.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1975 9 9 18 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1976 11 6 17 64.7% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 11 18 38.9%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1977 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1978 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 2 6 8 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 8 9 17 47.1%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% 70 67 137 51.1% 63 64 127 49.6% 67 67 134 50.0% 37 55 92 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Geoff Masters
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 0.0% -4.00 +0.09 1968 1511 104.2 +30 54.5% +0.45 +0.07
18 1970 1469 102.8 +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) +1.42 1969 1542 108.7 +20 -1 53.1% +0.47 2–1 (67%) +1.09
19 1971 1464 110.3 +69 +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) +0.86 1970 1581 113.8 +4 +1 48.9% +0.09 2–0 0–1 +2.04
20 1972 1566 111.3 +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) +0.23 1971 1573 113.6 -110 +36 +80 44.4% -0.32 9–3 (75%) 1–3 (25%) +2.45
21 1973 1567 117.1 -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) +0.29 1972 1670 122.7 -2 -18 -123 48.0% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) +1.43
22 1974 1718 135.3 +35 -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) +3.10 1973 1756 140.1 0 -38 -146 52.2% +0.18 11–7 (61%) 8–9 (47%) -1.32
23 1975 1740 131.7 -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) +1.45 1974 1766 141.0 -125 +49 -11 52.2% +0.31 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) -2.52
24 1976 1750 140.2 -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) +0.01 1975 1812 148.9 -23 -36 +8 53.0% +0.27 10–12 (45%) 6–8 (43%) -3.09
25 1977 1714 136.9 -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) +1.00 1976 1781 148.0 +86 -91 -12 48.5% +0.04 4–8 (33%) 9–4 (69%) -2.30
26 1978 1790 148.2 -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) -1.65 1977 1662 120.4 +90 -42 44.1% -0.40 8–10 (44%) 6–9 (40%) +2.97
27 1979 1808 135.7 -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) +3.20 1978 1701 140.0 +47 -24 -35 51.0% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 5–5 (50%) +1.79
28 1980 1928 142.9 -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) -0.21 1979 1729 143.8 -31 -3 -1 48.1% -0.11 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) -2.12
29 1981 1758 117.9 -77 +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) +1.26 1980 1518 124.9 +79 +146 +101 36.6% -0.87 4–8 (33%) 8–8 (50%) -0.05
30 1982 1786 145.7 +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) -1.50 1981 1501 94.8 0.0% -4.00 +0.19
31 1983 1681 108.0 +19 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) +0.49
32 1984 1690 121.4 +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 +0.40
33 1985 1668 111.3 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 -0.42
36 1988 1655 100.3 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 +0.23
Career 1947 139.8 -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 1890 139.6 +20 -4 -11 48.2% -0.04 77–78 (50%) 57–64 (47%) 99.9 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.