H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Guillermo Vilas H2H: 1-3

Guillermo Vilas holds a 3–1 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1980 Australian Open semifinal 6-7 6-4 6-2 2-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 74 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #36 6-7 6-4 6-2 2-6 6-4 Guillermo Vilas #4 Match data Jan 8, 1981* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Guillermo Vilas #6 6-4 3-6 6-1 Kim Warwick #73 Match data Oct 20, 1979* SF Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Vilas 6-2 6-4 Kim Warwick Match data Apr 3, 1976* R16 Sao Paulo Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Guillermo Vilas 6-3 6-0 6-0 Kim Warwick Match data May 24, 1972* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,355 890 283 75.9% 4 0 1 3 54 62

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Guillermo Vilas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,548 0 0
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,691 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,854 0 1
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1974 87–21 80.6% #5 2,175 0 8
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,134 0 13
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,104 0 19
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1977 128–15 89.5% #3 2,340 2 35
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,234 3 42
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1979 70–22 76.1% #6 2,092 4 46
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1980 62–18 77.5% #4 2,038 4 49
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1981 62–16 79.5% #6 2,035 4 52
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,016 4 59
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,949 4 62
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,792 4 62
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,768 4 62
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 62
34 — — — — — — — 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,718 4 62
35 — — — — — — — 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 62
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 62
39 — — — — — — — 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 62

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Guillermo Vilas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 63 10 73 86.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 71 11 82 86.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 47 9 56 83.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 19 6 25 76.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 90 5 95 94.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 14 4 18 77.8%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 11 2 13 84.6% 39 4 43 90.7% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1979 14 5 19 73.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 8 18 55.6%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1980 13 5 18 72.2% 38 6 44 86.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 55 9 64 85.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 10 3 13 76.9% 42 5 47 89.4% — — — — 18 8 26 69.2%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 8 3 11 72.7% 35 10 45 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 105 47 152 69.1% 630 164 794 79.3% 70 27 97 72.2% 85 45 130 65.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Guillermo Vilas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1507 101.4 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — 0.00
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1548 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 52.4% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +0.06
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1970 1533 100.6 — — — — — +32 — 35.3% -1.24 1–1 — — +0.31
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1971 1538 109.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.32
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1972 1692 117.2 — — — — -135 +67 -207 50.6% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — +2.75
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1973 1855 142.4 — — — — — +66 — 60.5% +0.49 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.97
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1974 2176 163.1 — — — — -398 +81 -339 74.5% +1.75 14–7 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -3.67
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1975 2135 164.8 — — — — -238 +124 -236 77.3% +1.83 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.26
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1976 2105 166.1 — — — — -55 +141 -116 74.3% +1.65 16–8 (67%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.39
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1977 2341 167.8 — — — — -130 +71 -360 81.4% +2.13 26–4 (87%) 24–9 (73%) — -0.99
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1978 2235 162.9 — — — — -67 +127 -120 78.4% +1.95 12–4 (75%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.26
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1979 2092 163.4 — — — — -76 +212 +65 70.9% +1.36 12–5 (71%) 18–12 (60%) — -2.83
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1980 2039 168.7 — — — — -56 +181 +106 72.7% +1.73 9–9 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — -3.22
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1981 2035 170.3 — — — — -90 +159 +3 73.8% +1.88 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.85
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1982 2016 167.5 — — — — -29 +191 — 75.6% +1.84 9–4 (69%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.32
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1983 1949 163.8 — — — — +35 +145 — 72.0% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.46
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1984 1792 143.4 — — — — +81 +158 — 51.9% +0.31 7–3 (70%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.09
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1985 1768 139.4 — — — — +33 +113 — 54.1% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.45
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 1986 1761 144.2 — — — — — +100 — 56.1% +0.62 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.52
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1718 134.7 — — — — — +82 — 55.1% +0.29 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1631 131.2 — — — — — +67 — 45.3% -0.17 3–7 (30%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.03
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 1989 1602 104.5 — — — — — +40 — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 1–0 — -0.27
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1578 103.1 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.15
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 2355 165.4 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% -88 +121 -141 70.6% +1.44 160–88 (65%) 154–116 (57%) 100.3 -2.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.