H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Hans Gildemeister H2H: 0-2

Hans Gildemeister holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hans Gildemeister leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Hans Gildemeister won the 1980 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Hans Gildemeister
CHI Age 70 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hans Gildemeister 6-4 6-4 Kim Warwick #37 Match data Jul 18, 1980* R16 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Hans Gildemeister 2-6 6-4 6-1 Kim Warwick #39 Match data May 19, 1978* R16 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 268 51.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Hans Gildemeister — — — 1,969 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Hans Gildemeister
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–21 34.4% #108 1,568 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Hans Gildemeister
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1975 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1976 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1977 — — — — 30 20 50 60.0% 1 0 1 100.0% — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1978 — — — — 27 18 45 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 27 9 36 75.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1980 — — — — 24 15 39 61.5% — — — — 1 0 1 100.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 — — — — 22 12 34 64.7% — — — — — — — —
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1983 — — — — 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 73 153 52.3% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 3 8 11 27.3% 174 116 290 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Hans Gildemeister
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 1975 1499 111.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.25
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1976 1515 105.4 — — — — — — — 55.6% +0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.86
21 1973 1568 115.6 — — — — -68 -6 +8 43.1% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.49 1977 1769 151.4 — — — — — +14 — 57.5% +0.62 11–3 (79%) 4–8 (33%) 105.7 -0.25
22 1974 1719 135.2 — — — — +34 — -72 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.07 1978 1776 146.3 — — — — — +20 — 56.9% +0.41 9–10 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -2.21
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -43 -121 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1979 1943 157.2 — — — — -352 +42 — 67.0% +0.99 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.39
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 0.00 1980 1830 146.6 — — — — — +27 — 59.2% +0.47 7–7 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 94.4 -0.61
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1981 1853 147.7 — — — — — +39 — 60.5% +0.94 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) 96.3 +0.14
26 1978 1790 148.1 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1982 1836 145.3 — — — — -212 +62 — 62.1% +0.91 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 103.2 -0.06
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1983 1726 128.2 — — — — — +42 — 42.9% -0.69 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -0.23
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1984 1743 135.7 — — — — — +41 — 52.2% +0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 -1.15
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1985 1642 116.1 — — — — -77 +53 — 39.5% -1.02 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.3 -0.07
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +24 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 1986 1551 101.7 — — — — — +73 — 20.0% -2.16 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — 0.00
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 1987 1533 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.7 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.6% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.90 — 1969 151.8 — — — — -223 +35 — 56.1% +0.40 55–46 (54%) 29–37 (44%) 94.0 -1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.