H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Hans Jurgen Pohmann H2H: 2-0

Kim Warwick holds a 2–0 lead over Hans Jurgen Pohmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1978 Stuttgart Open round of 16 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Hans Jurgen Pohmann
GER Age 79 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #42 6-4 7-6 Hans Jurgen Pohmann #222 Match data Jul 21, 1978* R16 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay
Kim Warwick #44 6-4 6-0 Hans Jurgen Pohmann Match data Nov 2, 1977* R64 Japan Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Hans Jurgen Pohmann #511 #30 0 1,828 125 128 49.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Hans Jurgen Pohmann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1968 8–10 44.4% — 1,494 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1969 2–6 25.0% — 1,460 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1970 5–5 50.0% — 1,531 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1971 5–6 45.5% — 1,546 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1972 0–4 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1973 25–12 67.6% #37 1,760 0 2
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1974 31–30 50.8% #44 1,754 0 2
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1975 19–27 41.3% #74 1,696 0 2
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1976 25–18 58.1% #40 1,753 0 2
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1977 1–5 16.7% #89 1,683 0 2
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1978 3–4 42.9% #284 1,661 0 2
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 1979 1–1 50.0% #511 1,654 0 2
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Hans Jurgen Pohmann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1968 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1970 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1971 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1972 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1973 7 3 10 70.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1974 8 10 18 44.4% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1975 4 4 8 50.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 31 26 57 54.4% 78 74 152 51.3% 5 11 16 31.2% 11 17 28 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Hans Jurgen Pohmann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1968 1495 106.7 — — — — +11 +26 — 45.5% -0.18 5–6 (45%) 0–1 — +0.25
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 1969 1460 100.5 — — — — — +30 — 38.1% -0.90 0–1 — — +0.39
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1970 1531 113.1 — — — — — +38 — 45.7% -0.26 2–1 (67%) — — +0.28
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1971 1547 109.2 — — — — — +62 — 48.7% -0.05 0–2 0–1 — +1.57
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1972 1481 97.4 — — — — — +54 — 0.0% -3.42 — — — +0.09
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1973 1761 126.3 — — — — -83 +24 -218 63.1% +0.66 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.51
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1974 1754 134.5 — — — — -57 +88 -257 48.2% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 4–9 (31%) 94.8 -0.18
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1975 1697 134.1 — — — — -12 +64 — 41.4% -0.40 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 94.5 +0.08
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1976 1754 133.9 — — — — -30 +23 — 57.0% +0.33 5–5 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 100.3 +1.88
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 1977 1683 100.4 — — — — +9 +32 — 16.7% -3.25 — 1–1 — -0.03
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 1978 1661 108.6 — — — — — +25 — 37.5% -0.81 2–0 0–1 — +0.38
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1979 1654 103.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 — — +0.30
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1829 130.2 — — — — -37 +46 -236 48.5% -0.09 31–29 (52%) 18–28 (39%) 94.6 +3.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.