H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Hans Kary H2H: 3-2
Kim Warwick holds a 3–2 lead over Hans Kary in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 2–0 on carpet, while Hans Kary leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1980 Stuttgart Indoor fourth round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 77
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1980* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kim Warwick | 7-6 6-1 | Hans Kary | Match data |
| May 21, 1976* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Hans Kary | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1975* | Barcelona Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kim Warwick | 6-4 6-4 | Hans Kary | Match data |
| Mar 21, 1974* | Calgary | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kim Warwick | 6-2 6-4 | Hans Kary | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1970* | Kitzbuehel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Hans Kary | 6-4 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hans Kary | #627 | #54 | 0 | 1,772 | 150 | 216 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Hans Kary | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #85 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #81 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #70 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #192 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,471 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |