H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Heinz Gunthardt H2H: 1-2

Heinz Gunthardt holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Heinz Gunthardt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1982 US Open round of 32 6-3 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Heinz Gunthardt
SUI Age 67 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #55 6-3 6-2 6-1 Heinz Gunthardt #46 Match data Sep 6, 1982* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Heinz Gunthardt #32 4-6 6-4 7-6 Kim Warwick #41 Match data Jul 13, 1980* F Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Heinz Gunthardt #54 5-7 7-6 6-1 Kim Warwick #60 Match data Aug 15, 1979* R64 Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Heinz Gunthardt #1,013 #22 0 1,969 225 189 54.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Heinz Gunthardt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1976 1–4 20.0% #210 1,496 0 0
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1977 3–6 33.3% #234 1,509 0 0
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1978 25–25 50.0% #55 1,765 0 1
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1979 30–23 56.6% #51 1,815 0 1
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1980 37–21 63.8% #26 1,834 0 4
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1981 28–22 56.0% #38 1,813 0 4
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1982 26–25 51.0% #85 1,722 0 4
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1983 27–15 64.3% #25 1,853 0 5
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1984 23–19 54.8% #31 1,779 0 5
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #36 1,820 0 5
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1986 3–9 25.0% #251 1,671 0 5
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1987 0–1 0.0% #954 1,664 0 5
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Heinz Gunthardt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1978 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1979 15 9 24 62.5% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 7 6 13 53.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 71 51 122 58.2% 101 76 177 57.1% 10 11 21 47.6% 43 51 94 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Heinz Gunthardt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1976 1497 106.8 — — — — — +44 — 27.3% -2.09 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1977 1510 115.1 — — — — +44 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +0.49
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 1978 1766 146.9 — — — — +3 -145 -225 48.8% -0.21 10–7 (59%) 9–7 (56%) 107.7 -3.10
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1979 1815 145.2 — — — — -9 -69 — 54.6% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 11–6 (65%) 106.3 -1.34
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1980 1835 148.3 — — — — +31 -59 -191 59.5% +0.48 12–8 (60%) 11–5 (69%) 105.9 -2.27
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 1981 1813 148.5 — — — — -9 +4 — 53.1% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 106.5 -2.56
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1982 1722 150.4 — — — — +6 +108 — 50.0% +0.01 5–3 (63%) 8–8 (50%) 100.4 -3.00
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1983 1853 151.4 — — — — -33 0 — 59.8% +0.76 10–9 (53%) 5–9 (36%) 96.3 -0.24
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1984 1779 140.1 — — — — -19 +105 — 50.5% +0.08 9–3 (75%) 10–13 (43%) 103.8 -0.50
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1985 1820 135.6 — — — — -43 -26 -105 50.0% +0.11 11–6 (65%) 6–11 (35%) 100.8 0.00
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1986 1672 117.2 — — — — +63 +24 — 38.2% -0.35 0–4 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 88.0 +0.03
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1987 1665 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.32
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1970 150.7 — — — — -3 -2 -167 52.3% +0.15 76–56 (58%) 71–74 (49%) 103.5 -3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.