H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Ismail El Shafei H2H: 1-2

Ismail El Shafei holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ismail El Shafei leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ismail El Shafei won the 1978 Queen's Club Championships round of 64 6-4 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick

AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H

1 – 2

3 main-draw meetings

Ismail El Shafei

EGY Age 78 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Ismail El Shafei	6-4 3-6 7-5	Kim Warwick #34	Match data	Jun 21, 1978*	R64	Queen's Club Championships	ATP 250	Grass
Kim Warwick #36	6-2 6-3	Ismail El Shafei	Match data	Nov 10, 1977*	R32	Hong Kong Open	ATP 250	Hard
Ismail El Shafei	7-6 6-4	Kim Warwick	Match data	Oct 23, 1974*	R32	Sydney Indoor	ATP 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Kim Warwick	#1,294	#15	15	1,946	288	268	51.8%	0	0	0	0	3	3
Ismail El Shafei	—	—	—	1,908	—	—	—	0	0	0	0	1	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Kim Warwick							Ismail El Shafei
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,483	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	6–8	42.9%	—	1,468	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	4–7	36.4%	—	1,463	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	11–9	55.0%	—	1,566	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1973	11–21	34.4%	#108	1,568	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1974	30–23	56.6%	#48	1,718	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1975	27–23	54.0%	#49	1,739	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1976	28–32	46.7%	#67	1,750	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	1977	35–29	54.7%	#42	1,713	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1978	29–23	55.8%	#41	1,790	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1979	36–25	59.0%	#52	1,808	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1980	39–25	60.9%	#36	1,927	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1981	6–11	35.3%	#29	1,758	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1982	15–15	50.0%	#36	1,786	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1983	3–7	30.0%	#99	1,681	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1984	6–5	54.5%	#196	1,690	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	1–3	25.0%	#497	1,667	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1–1	50.0%	#600	1,655	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Kim Warwick																	Ismail El Shafei
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1969	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	—	—	—	—	1968	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	0	2	100.0%
21	1973	1	4	5	20.0%	7	8	15	46.7%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1969	6	4	10	60.0%	10	8	18	55.6%	2	3	5	40.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
22	1974	12	8	20	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	6	13	53.8%	11	8	19	57.9%	1970	4	7	11	36.4%	2	5	7	28.6%	2	9	11	18.2%	3	6	9	33.3%
23	1975	5	7	12	41.7%	6	5	11	54.5%	5	3	8	62.5%	11	8	19	57.9%	1971	5	8	13	38.5%	12	8	20	60.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	4	11	15	26.7%
24	1976	5	6	11	45.5%	15	12	27	55.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	9	11	18.2%	1972	8	8	16	50.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	0	1	1	0.0%	10	11	21	47.6%
25	1977	3	7	10	30.0%	17	10	27	63.0%	12	9	21	57.1%	3	3	6	50.0%	1973	0	2	2	0.0%	2	11	13	15.4%	4	3	7	57.1%	4	6	10	40.0%
26	1978	3	4	7	42.9%	11	7	18	61.1%	8	4	12	66.7%	7	8	15	46.7%	1974	9	5	14	64.3%	15	10	25	60.0%	7	2	9	77.8%	1	3	4	25.0%
27	1979	6	5	11	54.5%	9	9	18	50.0%	14	6	20	70.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1975	5	6	11	45.5%	6	10	16	37.5%	2	2	4	50.0%	4	5	9	44.4%
28	1980	9	5	14	64.3%	10	10	20	50.0%	15	6	21	71.4%	5	4	9	55.6%	1976	3	5	8	37.5%	7	14	21	33.3%	4	3	7	57.1%	0	2	2	0.0%
29	1981	1	6	7	14.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1977	4	2	6	66.7%	8	11	19	42.1%	3	2	5	60.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
30	1982	7	6	13	53.8%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1978	4	5	9	44.4%	4	7	11	36.4%	2	5	7	28.6%	0	3	3	0.0%
31	1983	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	1979	3	3	6	50.0%	4	6	10	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
32	1984	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1980	—	—	—	—	2	4	6	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
33	1985	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1981	—	—	—	—	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	59	68	127	46.5%	80	73	153	52.3%	95	70	165	57.6%	54	57	111	48.6%	—	51	55	106	48.1%	78	102	180	43.3%	29	40	69	42.0%	32	53	85	37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Kim Warwick																Ismail El Shafei
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1969	1483	95.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1469	102.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	+41	43.8%	-0.16	1–2 (33%)	—	—	+1.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	1464	110.3	—	—	—	—	+69	—	+62	41.2%	-0.47	1–3 (25%)	2–1 (67%)	98.8	+0.86	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1566	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	+71	52.9%	-0.20	2–0	7–2 (78%)	—	+0.23	1968	1540	108.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	58.8%	+0.29	0–1	—	—	-0.37
21	1973	1568	115.6	—	—	—	—	-68	-6	+8	43.1%	-0.54	4–6 (40%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.49	1969	1656	128.0	—	—	—	—	-8	+11	-112	52.0%	+0.11	5–7 (42%)	—	—	-0.82
22	1974	1719	135.2	—	—	—	—	+34	—	-72	57.9%	+0.40	8–8 (50%)	9–5 (64%)	106.3	+3.07	1970	1611	132.3	—	—	—	—	+51	0	-116	36.6%	-0.96	2–10 (17%)	1–3 (25%)	91.9	-3.33
23	1975	1740	131.7	—	—	—	—	-43	-121	+35	53.0%	-0.02	8–6 (57%)	10–3 (77%)	108.6	+1.45	1971	1712	135.3	—	—	—	—	-81	+32	-221	43.5%	-0.64	5–12 (29%)	5–4 (56%)	96.3	-3.45
24	1976	1750	140.2	—	—	—	—	-100	-13	+61	52.1%	+0.06	6–14 (30%)	9–9 (50%)	95.7	0.00	1972	1852	151.6	—	—	—	—	-8	-77	—	44.6%	-0.18	9–5 (64%)	6–9 (40%)	105.2	-6.93
25	1977	1714	136.9	—	—	—	—	-91	+94	+27	53.7%	+0.18	14–4 (78%)	8–3 (73%)	111.3	+1.00	1973	1728	136.2	—	—	—	—	+58	-101	-128	38.7%	-0.99	3–7 (30%)	7–4 (64%)	101.9	-6.76
26	1978	1790	148.1	—	—	—	—	-41	-3	+16	52.6%	+0.14	12–6 (67%)	12–12 (50%)	107.1	-1.65	1974	1874	144.5	—	—	—	—	-57	-120	-72	58.6%	+0.70	9–5 (64%)	11–8 (58%)	110.9	-2.56
27	1979	1808	135.7	—	—	—	—	-13	-87	+52	56.5%	+0.25	9–5 (64%)	13–6 (68%)	108.0	+3.20	1975	1739	136.8	—	—	—	—	+69	-77	+57	42.4%	-0.34	8–7 (53%)	3–11 (21%)	94.0	-2.24
28	1980	1928	142.9	—	—	—	—	-103	-179	+49	57.2%	+0.61	16–7 (70%)	8–12 (40%)	104.8	-0.21	1976	1640	135.6	—	—	—	—	+75	-11	+177	42.7%	-0.49	2–9 (18%)	4–8 (33%)	91.7	-1.80
29	1981	1758	117.9	—	—	—	—	-77	—	+186	47.2%	+0.08	2–1 (67%)	1–4 (20%)	98.1	+1.26	1977	1669	125.0	—	—	—	—	+59	-76	+111	49.4%	-0.08	5–4 (56%)	9–7 (56%)	101.7	+1.94
30	1982	1786	145.7	—	—	—	—	+24	-97	+71	52.1%	+0.49	5–5 (50%)	2–7 (22%)	97.2	-1.50	1978	1575	137.1	—	—	—	—	+69	+26	+160	42.3%	-0.28	2–9 (18%)	7–5 (58%)	95.2	-0.37
31	1983	1681	108.0	—	—	—	—	+19	—	—	34.5%	-0.90	2–1 (67%)	1–2 (33%)	99.8	+0.49	1979	1559	115.8	—	—	—	—	+56	+25	—	41.9%	-0.44	2–3 (40%)	2–6 (25%)	95.5	+1.44
32	1984	1690	121.4	—	—	—	—	—	+41	+128	65.2%	+0.87	3–2 (60%)	1–1	—	+0.40	1980	1522	112.0	—	—	—	—	—	+26	—	38.1%	-0.52	0–2	2–3 (40%)	—	+1.52
33	1985	1668	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	1–1	—	-0.42	1981	1549	109.4	—	—	—	—	—	+5	—	50.0%	-0.10	2–2 (50%)	2–3 (40%)	98.4	+0.91
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	1543	104.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	37.5%	-1.13	1–1	—	—	+0.17
36	1988	1655	100.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1947	139.7	—	—	—	—	-34	-32	+42	52.6%	+0.13	94–71 (57%)	86–71 (55%)	110.5	+1.90	—	1908	141.9	—	—	—	—	+10	-35	-26	45.5%	-0.28	55–84 (40%)	59–71 (45%)	94.3	-5.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Kim Warwick's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Roscoe Tanner	4	5	9	Dec 1, 1983	H2H
Geoff Masters	4	5	9	Oct 27, 1978	H2H
Sandy Mayer	3	5	8	Mar 14, 1981	H2H
Raul Ramirez	3	5	8	Apr 29, 1978	H2H
Tim Gullikson	2	5	7	Nov 10, 1983	—

Ismail El Shafei's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Arthur Ashe	7	8	15	Nov 8, 1975	—
Marty Riessen	4	10	14	Jul 19, 1973	—
Tom Okker	4	7	11	Nov 8, 1978	—
Rod Laver	4	6	10	Apr 18, 1975	—
John Newcombe	3	7	10	Nov 21, 1974	—