H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Jim Delaney H2H: 2-2

Kim Warwick and Jim Delaney are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Delaney leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Delaney won the 1981 Sydney Indoor round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Jim Delaney
USA Age 73 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Delaney 6-4 6-4 Kim Warwick #15 Match data Oct 15, 1981* R32 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick #49 6-1 6-3 Jim Delaney Match data Dec 14, 1979* R16 Adelaide International ATP 250 Grass
Jim Delaney 5-7 7-5 6-4 Kim Warwick #36 Match data Nov 23, 1977* R32 Taipei ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick 6-4 6-4 Jim Delaney Match data Nov 3, 1976* R64 Japan Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jim Delaney #262 #64 0 1,678 78 131 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Jim Delaney
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1972 1–5 16.7% — 1,453 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1973 4–5 44.4% #159 1,535 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1974 9–7 56.2% #109 1,589 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1975 10–14 41.7% #73 1,647 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1976 20–29 40.8% #64 1,633 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1977 16–27 37.2% #74 1,624 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1978 0–2 0.0% #418 1,602 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1979 2–9 18.2% #276 1,521 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1980 2–5 28.6% #269 1,512 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1981 11–21 34.4% — 1,514 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1982 3–7 30.0% — 1,513 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Jim Delaney
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1972 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1976 12 9 21 57.1% 4 12 16 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1977 4 8 12 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1980 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1981 2 7 9 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 23 39 62 37.1% 23 47 70 32.9% 16 20 36 44.4% 16 25 41 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Jim Delaney
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1972 1453 97.8 — — — — +87 — — 31.3% -1.13 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.33
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1973 1535 115.9 — — — — — +29 — 43.5% -0.04 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.95
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1974 1590 115.9 — — — — +3 -44 -43 51.2% +0.15 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.56
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1975 1648 130.0 — — — — -58 -15 — 40.7% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.20
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1976 1633 124.0 — — — — +10 -63 -67 40.3% -0.51 9–7 (56%) 5–11 (31%) — +2.59
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1977 1625 131.3 — — — — +11 -87 -49 41.1% -0.61 9–11 (45%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.92
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1978 1602 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1979 1521 100.2 — — — — +41 -40 +50 25.9% -1.41 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.72
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1980 1513 116.6 — — — — +44 — — 35.3% -0.65 1–2 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.36
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1981 1514 115.6 — — — — -18 -33 +92 42.4% -0.82 3–10 (23%) 10–4 (71%) — +1.04
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1982 1514 105.2 — — — — — -10 — 31.8% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1678 125.3 — — — — +4 -38 +3 40.0% -0.67 33–44 (43%) 36–37 (49%) 102.3 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.