H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs John Eagleton H2H: 1-0
Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over John Eagleton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1972 Johannesburg first round 7-6 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1972* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R128 | Hard | Kim Warwick | 7-6 6-2 7-6 | John Eagleton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| John Eagleton | #356 | #272 | 0 | 1,500 | 1 | 4 | 20.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kim Warwick | John Eagleton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |