H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs John Lloyd H2H: 3-0

Kim Warwick holds a 3–0 lead over John Lloyd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1979 Surbiton round of 32 4-6 6-3 11-9.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
John Lloyd
GBR Age 72 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick #52 4-6 6-3 11-9 John Lloyd Match data Jun 21, 1979* R32 Surbiton ATP 250 Grass
Kim Warwick #45 6-4 6-2 John Lloyd Match data Apr 28, 1978* R16 Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Kim Warwick #39 6-3 6-3 John Lloyd Match data Jan 30, 1975* R32 Richmond-Wct ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
John Lloyd — — — 1,885 — — — 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick John Lloyd
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick John Lloyd
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1974 2 3 5 40.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1975 1 2 3 33.3% 8 13 21 38.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1977 9 8 17 52.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1978 3 6 9 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1979 3 6 9 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1981 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 11 9 20 55.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 57 60 117 48.7% 43 70 113 38.1% 45 50 95 47.4% 28 48 76 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick John Lloyd
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1487 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1972 1490 97.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.08
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1973 1512 113.9 — — — — +71 +36 -13 41.8% -0.78 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — +1.06
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1974 1608 123.1 — — — — -25 -131 +66 44.3% -0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.47
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1975 1629 131.7 — — — — -42 -59 +41 41.6% -0.66 5–11 (31%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.19
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1976 1698 138.2 — — — — -12 -113 -42 46.0% -0.44 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.63
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1977 1833 144.8 — — — — -6 -264 -67 51.1% -0.04 5–12 (29%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.14
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1978 1746 143.7 — — — — +22 -97 +34 46.9% -0.47 6–5 (55%) 5–1 (83%) — -2.65
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1979 1685 130.7 — — — — -7 +23 +19 41.6% -0.61 4–7 (36%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.99
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1980 1602 103.2 — — — — -2 +80 +77 17.4% -2.74 — — — -0.08
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1981 1683 129.2 — — — — -34 — +12 40.5% -0.84 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.96
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1982 1604 124.7 — — — — +20 +102 -8 39.3% -0.92 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.59
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1983 1681 132.2 — — — — +12 -22 -15 49.2% +0.16 2–3 (40%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.42
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1984 1785 137.8 — — — — +44 -113 -176 50.0% -0.08 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.67
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1985 1823 140.0 — — — — -53 -163 -75 52.3% +0.16 6–5 (55%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.54
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1986 1723 128.9 — — — — +31 -84 — 41.9% -0.68 0–1 0–1 — -1.47
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1886 141.0 — — — — -4 -82 -13 45.3% -0.43 56–69 (45%) 60–54 (53%) 103.6 -2.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.