H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs John Sadri H2H: 0-2

John Sadri holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Sadri leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, John Sadri won the 1979 Australian Open round of 16 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-2 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
John Sadri
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Sadri #45 3-6 4-6 6-3 6-2 9-7 Kim Warwick #52 Match data Jan 2, 1980* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
John Sadri #76 7-6 2-6 6-2 Kim Warwick #58 Match data Oct 27, 1979* QF Japan Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
John Sadri #997 #14 0 1,980 214 189 53.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick John Sadri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1976 0–1 0.0% #360 1,498 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1977 0–1 0.0% #322 1,496 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1978 6–8 42.9% #84 1,564 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1979 29–24 54.7% #45 1,861 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1980 47–25 65.3% #15 1,939 0 1
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1981 22–21 51.2% #36 1,736 0 1
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1982 32–23 58.2% #38 1,737 0 2
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1983 8–13 38.1% #93 1,641 0 2
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1984 25–16 61.0% #29 1,811 0 2
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1985 25–25 50.0% #46 1,750 0 2
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1986 12–21 36.4% #130 1,648 0 2
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1987 8–11 42.1% #173 1,602 0 2
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick John Sadri
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1979 9 8 17 52.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1980 14 7 21 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 18 10 28 64.3%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 10 21 52.4%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 15 9 24 62.5%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 11 11 22 50.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 58 62 120 48.3% 14 15 29 48.3% 68 46 114 59.6% 74 66 140 52.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick John Sadri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1976 1499 111.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.27
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1977 1497 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.07
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1978 1564 130.6 — — — — +6 — +44 50.0% +0.11 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.84
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1979 1861 151.0 — — — — -119 -244 -56 51.8% +0.17 11–5 (69%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.45
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1980 1940 157.0 — — — — +11 — -34 62.3% +0.72 9–12 (43%) 19–16 (54%) — -5.20
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1981 1737 143.0 — — — — +67 — +81 48.1% +0.04 9–6 (60%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.48
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1982 1738 142.8 — — — — +19 -126 +70 56.2% +0.37 11–11 (50%) 19–19 (50%) — -1.52
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1983 1641 128.2 — — — — +86 — +64 39.2% -0.33 2–2 (50%) 4–8 (33%) — +1.38
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1984 1812 142.4 — — — — -66 -146 +50 57.1% +0.42 7–6 (54%) 10–14 (42%) — -0.17
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1985 1751 142.3 — — — — -39 — +121 49.2% -0.08 7–7 (50%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.23
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1986 1649 140.6 — — — — -1 — +163 42.4% -0.39 3–8 (27%) 9–10 (47%) — -1.80
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1987 1602 121.9 — — — — +47 — +90 44.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.33
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1980 150.7 — — — — -7 -179 +46 52.1% +0.17 62–61 (50%) 99–112 (47%) 97.5 -2.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.