Kim Warwick
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roscoe Tanner | 4 | 5 | 9 | Dec 1, 1983 | H2H |
| Geoff Masters | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 27, 1978 | H2H |
| Sandy Mayer | 3 | 5 | 8 | Mar 14, 1981 | H2H |
| Raul Ramirez | 3 | 5 | 8 | Apr 29, 1978 | H2H |
| Tim Gullikson | 2 | 5 | 7 | Nov 10, 1983 | — |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Jose Luis Clerc H2H: 2-1 (incl. walkovers)
Kim Warwick vs Jose Luis Clerc: 1–1 excluding walkovers; 2–1 including 1 walkover. Across 3 main-draw results including walkovers, Kim Warwick leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jose Luis Clerc leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1982 US Open round of 128 3-6 6-4 1-6 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H including walkovers
2
–
1
3 main-draw results
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | 3-6 6-4 1-6 6-1 7-6 | Jose Luis Clerc | Match data | Sep 2, 1982* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Kim Warwick | (w/o) | Jose Luis Clerc | Match data | Aug 14, 1982* | R16 | La Costa Wct | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 6-2 6-1 | Kim Warwick | Match data | Aug 8, 1980* | R16 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,946 | 288 | 268 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jose Luis Clerc | #1,263 | #4 | 20 | 2,219 | 355 | 138 | 72.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Jose Luis Clerc | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #366 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #17 | 1,931 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #108 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 65–20 | 76.5% | #8 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #5 | 2,071 | 0 | 16 |
| 23 | 1975 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #49 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 66–23 | 74.2% | #6 | 1,957 | 0 | 21 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #8 | 1,903 | 0 | 25 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #42 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #28 | 1,832 | 0 | 25 |
| 27 | 1979 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #52 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,927 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,786 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #514 | 1,738 | 0 | 25 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,681 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,667 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Jose Luis Clerc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1969 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1971 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 47 | 13 | 60 | 78.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1973 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1980 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 47 | 7 | 54 | 87.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 22 | 1974 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1981 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 44 | 5 | 49 | 89.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 23 | 1975 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1982 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 57 | 11 | 68 | 83.8% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% |
| 24 | 1976 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 1983 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 24 | 9 | 33 | 72.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1977 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1984 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 59 | 68 | 127 | 46.5% | 80 | 73 | 153 | 52.3% | 95 | 70 | 165 | 57.6% | 54 | 57 | 111 | 48.6% | — | 42 | 18 | 60 | 70.0% | 284 | 83 | 367 | 77.4% | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 18 | 27 | 45 | 40.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Jose Luis Clerc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1969 | 1483 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 1469 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | 43.8% | -0.16 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +1.42 | 1977 | 1488 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | +58 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.10 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.52 |
| 19 | 1971 | 1464 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | +62 | 41.2% | -0.47 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | 98.8 | +0.86 | 1978 | 1862 | 154.7 | — | — | — | — | -272 | +119 | -369 | 69.4% | +1.32 | 9–2 (82%) | 5–1 (83%) | 113.4 | +2.11 |
| 20 | 1972 | 1566 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +71 | 52.9% | -0.20 | 2–0 | 7–2 (78%) | — | +0.23 | 1979 | 1931 | 152.6 | — | — | — | — | -134 | +53 | -305 | 66.3% | +1.18 | 12–8 (60%) | 12–11 (52%) | 103.5 | +0.45 |
| 21 | 1973 | 1568 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | -68 | -6 | +8 | 43.1% | -0.54 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.49 | 1980 | 2016 | 159.7 | — | — | — | — | -176 | +145 | -322 | 69.7% | +1.31 | 16–8 (67%) | 9–7 (56%) | 105.3 | -2.07 |
| 22 | 1974 | 1719 | 135.2 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | -72 | 57.9% | +0.40 | 8–8 (50%) | 9–5 (64%) | 106.3 | +3.07 | 1981 | 2071 | 165.6 | — | — | — | — | -211 | +222 | -366 | 73.3% | +1.59 | 13–4 (76%) | 11–8 (58%) | 105.8 | -2.26 |
| 23 | 1975 | 1740 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -43 | -121 | +35 | 53.0% | -0.02 | 8–6 (57%) | 10–3 (77%) | 108.6 | +1.45 | 1982 | 1957 | 162.1 | — | — | — | — | -187 | +262 | — | 68.8% | +1.41 | 17–9 (65%) | 12–7 (63%) | 99.4 | -1.60 |
| 24 | 1976 | 1750 | 140.2 | — | — | — | — | -100 | -13 | +61 | 52.1% | +0.06 | 6–14 (30%) | 9–9 (50%) | 95.7 | 0.00 | 1983 | 1904 | 155.8 | — | — | — | — | -155 | +213 | — | 65.6% | +1.19 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.4 | -0.11 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1714 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -91 | +94 | +27 | 53.7% | +0.18 | 14–4 (78%) | 8–3 (73%) | 111.3 | +1.00 | 1984 | 1828 | 140.7 | — | — | — | — | -86 | +138 | — | 58.8% | +0.76 | 0–2 | 3–3 (50%) | — | -0.10 |
| 26 | 1978 | 1790 | 148.1 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -3 | +16 | 52.6% | +0.14 | 12–6 (67%) | 12–12 (50%) | 107.1 | -1.65 | 1985 | 1832 | 146.7 | — | — | — | — | -119 | +94 | — | 64.2% | +0.80 | 3–3 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | 98.8 | -1.21 |
| 27 | 1979 | 1808 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -87 | +52 | 56.5% | +0.25 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–6 (68%) | 108.0 | +3.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 1928 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | -103 | -179 | +49 | 57.2% | +0.61 | 16–7 (70%) | 8–12 (40%) | 104.8 | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 1758 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | -77 | — | +186 | 47.2% | +0.08 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.1 | +1.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 1786 | 145.7 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -97 | +71 | 52.1% | +0.49 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–7 (22%) | 97.2 | -1.50 | 1989 | 1739 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +88 | — | 30.8% | -1.69 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 |
| 31 | 1983 | 1681 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 34.5% | -0.90 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.8 | +0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 1690 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | +128 | 65.2% | +0.87 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 1668 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 1655 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1947 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -32 | +42 | 52.6% | +0.13 | 94–71 (57%) | 86–71 (55%) | 110.5 | +1.90 | — | 2220 | 161.4 | — | — | — | — | -162 | +162 | -333 | 67.6% | +1.24 | 74–42 (64%) | 61–45 (58%) | 105.1 | -0.83 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jose Luis Clerc
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | 7 | 7 | 14 | Sep 14, 1985 | H2H |
| Guillermo Vilas | 4 | 10 | 14 | Jul 19, 1985 | H2H |
| Andres Gomez | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
| Jose Higueras | 5 | 5 | 10 | Jan 15, 1984 | H2H |
| Eddie Dibbs | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 21, 1983 | H2H |