H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Jose Luis Clerc H2H: 2-1

Kim Warwick holds a 2–1 lead over Jose Luis Clerc in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jose Luis Clerc leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1982 US Open round of 128 3-6 6-4 1-6 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick

AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H

2 – 1

3 main draw meetings

Jose Luis Clerc

ARG Age 68 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Kim Warwick #55	3-6 6-4 1-6 6-1 7-6	Jose Luis Clerc #7	Match data	Sep 2, 1982*	R128	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Kim Warwick #49	(w/o)	Jose Luis Clerc #7	Match data	Aug 14, 1982*	R16	La Costa Wct	ATP 250	Hard
Jose Luis Clerc #16	6-2 6-1	Kim Warwick #36	Match data	Aug 8, 1980*	R16	Indianapolis	ATP 250	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Kim Warwick	#1,294	#15	15	1,946	288	269	51.7%	0	0	0	0	3	3
Jose Luis Clerc	#1,263	#4	20	2,219	355	138	72.0%	0	0	0	1	24	25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Kim Warwick							Jose Luis Clerc
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,483	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	6–8	42.9%	—	1,468	0	0	1977	1–3	25.0%	#366	1,488	0	0
19	1971	4–7	36.4%	—	1,463	0	0	1978	50–17	74.6%	#15	1,862	0	3
20	1972	11–9	55.0%	—	1,566	0	0	1979	53–22	70.7%	#17	1,931	0	4
21	1973	11–22	33.3%	#108	1,567	0	0	1980	65–20	76.5%	#8	2,016	0	10
22	1974	30–23	56.6%	#48	1,718	0	0	1981	54–12	81.8%	#5	2,071	0	16
23	1975	27–23	54.0%	#49	1,739	0	0	1982	66–23	74.2%	#6	1,957	0	21
24	1976	28–32	46.7%	#67	1,750	0	1	1983	29–14	67.4%	#8	1,903	0	25
25	1977	35–29	54.7%	#42	1,713	0	1	1984	13–10	56.5%	#33	1,827	0	25
26	1978	29–23	55.8%	#41	1,790	0	1	1985	23–13	63.9%	#28	1,832	0	25
27	1979	36–25	59.0%	#52	1,808	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1980	39–25	60.9%	#36	1,927	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1981	6–11	35.3%	#29	1,758	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1982	15–15	50.0%	#36	1,786	0	3	1989	1–4	20.0%	#514	1,738	0	25
31	1983	3–7	30.0%	#99	1,681	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1984	6–5	54.5%	#196	1,690	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	1–3	25.0%	#497	1,667	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1–1	50.0%	#600	1,655	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Kim Warwick																	Jose Luis Clerc
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1969	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1977	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
19	1971	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	1978	2	1	3	66.7%	47	13	60	78.3%	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	—	—	—	—	1979	15	3	18	83.3%	31	14	45	68.9%	4	2	6	66.7%	3	3	6	50.0%
21	1973	1	4	5	20.0%	7	9	16	43.8%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1980	8	3	11	72.7%	47	7	54	87.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	6	7	13	46.2%
22	1974	12	8	20	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	6	13	53.8%	11	8	19	57.9%	1981	7	2	9	77.8%	44	5	49	89.8%	2	1	3	66.7%	1	4	5	20.0%
23	1975	5	7	12	41.7%	6	5	11	54.5%	5	3	8	62.5%	11	8	19	57.9%	1982	2	3	5	40.0%	57	11	68	83.8%	—	—	—	—	7	9	16	43.8%
24	1976	5	6	11	45.5%	15	12	27	55.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	9	11	18.2%	1983	5	1	6	83.3%	24	9	33	72.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	3	3	0.0%
25	1977	3	7	10	30.0%	17	10	27	63.0%	12	9	21	57.1%	3	3	6	50.0%	1984	2	2	4	50.0%	11	8	19	57.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	1978	3	4	7	42.9%	11	7	18	61.1%	8	4	12	66.7%	7	8	15	46.7%	1985	1	2	3	33.3%	22	11	33	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1979	6	5	11	54.5%	9	9	18	50.0%	14	6	20	70.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1980	9	5	14	64.3%	10	10	20	50.0%	15	6	21	71.4%	5	4	9	55.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1981	1	6	7	14.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1982	7	6	13	53.8%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1989	—	—	—	—	1	4	5	20.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1983	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1984	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	59	68	127	46.5%	80	74	154	51.9%	95	70	165	57.6%	54	57	111	48.6%	—	42	18	60	70.0%	284	83	367	77.4%	11	10	21	52.4%	18	27	45	40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Kim Warwick																Jose Luis Clerc
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1969	1483	95.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1469	102.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	+41	43.8%	-0.16	1–2 (33%)	—	—	+1.42	1977	1488	104.9	—	—	—	—	+58	—	—	40.0%	-0.10	0–2	—	—	+0.53
19	1971	1464	110.3	—	—	—	—	+69	—	+62	41.2%	-0.47	1–3 (25%)	2–1 (67%)	—	+0.86	1978	1862	154.7	—	—	—	—	-272	+118	-369	69.4%	+1.32	9–2 (82%)	5–1 (83%)	—	+2.11
20	1972	1566	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	+71	52.9%	-0.20	2–0	7–2 (78%)	—	+0.23	1979	1931	152.6	—	—	—	—	-134	+53	-305	66.3%	+1.18	12–8 (60%)	12–11 (52%)	—	+0.45
21	1973	1567	117.1	—	—	—	—	-67	-6	+9	41.9%	-0.62	4–6 (40%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.29	1980	2016	159.7	—	—	—	—	-176	+145	-322	69.7%	+1.31	16–8 (67%)	9–7 (56%)	—	-2.07
22	1974	1718	135.3	—	—	—	—	+35	—	-71	57.9%	+0.40	8–8 (50%)	9–5 (64%)	—	+3.10	1981	2071	165.6	—	—	—	—	-211	+222	-366	73.3%	+1.59	13–4 (76%)	11–8 (58%)	—	-2.26
23	1975	1740	131.7	—	—	—	—	-44	-122	+35	53.0%	-0.02	8–6 (57%)	10–3 (77%)	—	+1.45	1982	1957	162.1	—	—	—	—	-187	+262	—	68.8%	+1.41	17–9 (65%)	12–7 (63%)	—	-1.60
24	1976	1750	140.2	—	—	—	—	-100	-13	+61	52.1%	+0.06	6–14 (30%)	9–9 (50%)	—	+0.01	1983	1904	155.8	—	—	—	—	-155	+213	—	65.6%	+1.19	4–3 (57%)	2–3 (40%)	—	-0.11
25	1977	1714	136.9	—	—	—	—	-91	+94	+27	53.7%	+0.18	14–4 (78%)	8–3 (73%)	—	+1.00	1984	1828	140.7	—	—	—	—	-86	+138	—	58.8%	+0.76	0–2	3–3 (50%)	—	-0.10
26	1978	1790	148.2	—	—	—	—	-41	-3	+16	52.6%	+0.14	12–6 (67%)	12–12 (50%)	—	-1.65	1985	1832	146.7	—	—	—	—	-119	+94	—	64.2%	+0.80	3–3 (50%)	7–4 (64%)	—	-1.21
27	1979	1808	135.7	—	—	—	—	-13	-87	+52	56.5%	+0.25	9–5 (64%)	13–6 (68%)	—	+3.20	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1980	1928	142.9	—	—	—	—	-103	-179	+49	57.2%	+0.61	16–7 (70%)	8–12 (40%)	—	-0.21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1981	1758	117.9	—	—	—	—	-77	—	+186	47.2%	+0.08	2–1 (67%)	1–4 (20%)	—	+1.26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1982	1786	145.7	—	—	—	—	+25	-97	+71	52.1%	+0.49	5–5 (50%)	2–7 (22%)	—	-1.50	1989	1739	102.4	—	—	—	—	—	+88	—	30.8%	-1.69	0–1	0–1	—	+0.23
31	1983	1681	108.0	—	—	—	—	+19	—	—	34.5%	-0.90	2–1 (67%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.49	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1984	1690	121.4	—	—	—	—	—	+41	+128	65.2%	+0.87	3–2 (60%)	1–1	—	+0.40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	1668	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	1–1	—	-0.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1655	100.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1947	139.8	—	—	—	—	-34	-32	+42	52.5%	+0.13	94–71 (57%)	86–71 (55%)	110.5	+1.86	—	2220	161.4	—	—	—	—	-162	+162	-333	67.6%	+1.24	74–42 (64%)	61–45 (58%)	105.1	-0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Kim Warwick's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Roscoe Tanner	4	5	9	Dec 1, 1983	H2H
Geoff Masters	4	5	9	Oct 27, 1978	H2H
Sandy Mayer	3	5	8	Mar 14, 1981	H2H
Raul Ramirez	3	5	8	Apr 29, 1978	H2H
Tim Gullikson	2	5	7	Nov 10, 1983	—

Jose Luis Clerc's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Ivan Lendl	7	7	14	Sep 14, 1985	H2H
Guillermo Vilas	4	10	14	Jul 19, 1985	H2H
Andres Gomez	8	3	11	May 31, 1989	H2H
Jose Higueras	5	5	10	Jan 15, 1984	H2H
Eddie Dibbs	4	5	9	Jul 21, 1983	H2H