H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Juan Gisbert H2H: 0-3

Juan Gisbert holds a 3–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Gisbert leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Gisbert won the 1976 Munich Open round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Juan Gisbert
ESP Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Gisbert 6-1 6-3 Kim Warwick Match data May 7, 1976* R32 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Juan Gisbert 6-3 2-6 13-11 Kim Warwick Match data Nov 13, 1975* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard
Juan Gisbert 6-2 6-2 Kim Warwick Match data Apr 26, 1973* R32 Madrid ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Juan Gisbert — — — 1,887 172 145 54.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kim Warwick Juan Gisbert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1968 13–11 54.2% — 1,618 0 0
1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,605 0 0
1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1970 10–9 52.6% — 1,738 0 0
1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1971 17–13 56.7% — 1,802 0 1
1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1972 22–17 56.4% — 1,762 0 1
1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1973 23–21 52.3% — 1,663 0 1
1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1974 33–26 55.9% — 1,787 0 1
1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1975 40–27 59.7% — 1,798 0 2
1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1976 14–20 41.2% — 1,635 0 2
1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 — — — — — — —
1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 — — — — — — —
1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 — — — — — — —
1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 — — — — — — —
1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 — — — — — — —
1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Kim Warwick Juan Gisbert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1968 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 13 8 21 61.9% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 4 3 7 57.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1973 11 8 19 57.9% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 8 5 13 61.5% 20 15 35 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 26 17 43 60.5% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 13 16 29 44.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% Career 32 29 61 52.5% 105 88 193 54.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 29 24 53 54.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kim Warwick Juan Gisbert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 1968 1618 121.2 — — — — -109 +20 +3 52.7% +0.28 4–2 (67%) — — -0.76
1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 1969 1605 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.19
1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 1970 1738 135.4 — — — — -129 +14 — 49.2% +0.03 5–3 (63%) — — -1.01
1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1971 1803 127.6 — — — — -194 +25 — 56.3% +0.41 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 99.8 +0.36
1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1972 1763 131.1 — — — — -9 +8 -137 55.6% +0.34 8–5 (62%) 6–2 (75%) 107.7 -0.80
1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 1973 1663 119.8 — — — — +56 -8 — 55.2% +0.48 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +3.61
1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 1974 1788 140.6 — — — — -9 +5 — 55.9% +0.51 11–8 (58%) 7–9 (44%) 101.3 -0.10
1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1975 1799 137.2 — — — — -11 +3 — 59.7% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 9–8 (53%) 100.9 +4.61
1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1976 1635 123.3 — — — — +89 +8 — 43.9% -0.48 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 +0.82
1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 Career 1888 136.1 — — — — -15 +8 -67 54.5% +0.33 58–47 (55%) 34–31 (52%) 104.2 +2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.