H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Jurgen Fassbender H2H: 2-1

Kim Warwick holds a 2–1 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Warwick leads 2–0 on clay, while Jurgen Fassbender leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1977 Dutch Open round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick

AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H

2 – 1

3 main-draw meetings

Jurgen Fassbender

GER Age 78 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Kim Warwick #44	6-3 6-1	Jurgen Fassbender #59	Match data	Jul 16, 1977*	R16	Dutch Open	ATP 250	Clay
Jurgen Fassbender	6-3 7-5	Kim Warwick	Match data	Oct 31, 1974*	R16	Christchurch	ATP 250	Grass
Kim Warwick #114	3-6 6-4 6-2	Jurgen Fassbender #34	Match data	Oct 12, 1973*	R16	Japan Open	ATP 250	Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Kim Warwick	#1,294	#15	15	1,946	288	268	51.8%	0	0	0	0	3	3
Jurgen Fassbender	#618	#31	0	1,888	183	167	52.3%	0	0	0	0	3	3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Kim Warwick							Jurgen Fassbender
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
17	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,483	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	6–8	42.9%	—	1,468	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	4–7	36.4%	—	1,463	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	11–9	55.0%	—	1,566	0	0	1968	8–10	44.4%	—	1,485	0	0
21	1973	11–21	34.4%	#108	1,568	0	0	1969	2–5	28.6%	—	1,452	0	0
22	1974	30–23	56.6%	#48	1,718	0	0	1970	2–6	25.0%	—	1,426	0	0
23	1975	27–23	54.0%	#49	1,739	0	0	1971	2–6	25.0%	—	1,424	0	0
24	1976	28–32	46.7%	#67	1,750	0	1	1972	9–11	45.0%	—	1,630	0	0
25	1977	35–29	54.7%	#42	1,713	0	1	1973	47–24	66.2%	#46	1,739	0	1
26	1978	29–23	55.8%	#41	1,790	0	1	1974	41–30	57.7%	#54	1,735	0	2
27	1979	36–25	59.0%	#52	1,808	0	2	1975	28–25	52.8%	#64	1,680	0	3
28	1980	39–25	60.9%	#36	1,927	0	3	1976	9–12	42.9%	#93	1,662	0	3
29	1981	6–11	35.3%	#29	1,758	0	3	1977	21–21	50.0%	#63	1,684	0	3
30	1982	15–15	50.0%	#36	1,786	0	3	1978	10–12	45.5%	#151	1,671	0	3
31	1983	3–7	30.0%	#99	1,681	0	3	1979	4–5	44.4%	#242	1,630	0	3
32	1984	6–5	54.5%	#196	1,690	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	1–3	25.0%	#497	1,667	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1–1	50.0%	#600	1,655	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Kim Warwick																	Jurgen Fassbender
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
17	1969	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	6	16	62.5%	—	—	—	—	1968	2	3	5	40.0%	6	5	11	54.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
21	1973	1	4	5	20.0%	7	8	15	46.7%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1969	—	—	—	—	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1974	12	8	20	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	6	13	53.8%	11	8	19	57.9%	1970	—	—	—	—	2	4	6	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
23	1975	5	7	12	41.7%	6	5	11	54.5%	5	3	8	62.5%	11	8	19	57.9%	1971	—	—	—	—	2	4	6	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
24	1976	5	6	11	45.5%	15	12	27	55.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	9	11	18.2%	1972	0	1	1	0.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
25	1977	3	7	10	30.0%	17	10	27	63.0%	12	9	21	57.1%	3	3	6	50.0%	1973	19	12	31	61.3%	12	6	18	66.7%	7	4	11	63.6%	9	2	11	81.8%
26	1978	3	4	7	42.9%	11	7	18	61.1%	8	4	12	66.7%	7	8	15	46.7%	1974	13	10	23	56.5%	11	7	18	61.1%	4	3	7	57.1%	13	10	23	56.5%
27	1979	6	5	11	54.5%	9	9	18	50.0%	14	6	20	70.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1975	6	3	9	66.7%	14	13	27	51.9%	1	1	2	50.0%	7	8	15	46.7%
28	1980	9	5	14	64.3%	10	10	20	50.0%	15	6	21	71.4%	5	4	9	55.6%	1976	2	3	5	40.0%	7	8	15	46.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
29	1981	1	6	7	14.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1977	4	7	11	36.4%	14	10	24	58.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
30	1982	7	6	13	53.8%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1978	0	1	1	0.0%	10	11	21	47.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1983	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	1979	—	—	—	—	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%
32	1984	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	59	68	127	46.5%	80	73	153	52.3%	95	70	165	57.6%	54	57	111	48.6%	—	46	40	86	53.5%	88	83	171	51.5%	17	19	36	47.2%	32	25	57	56.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Kim Warwick																Jurgen Fassbender
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
17	1969	1483	95.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1970	1469	102.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	+41	43.8%	-0.16	1–2 (33%)	—	—	+1.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1971	1464	110.3	—	—	—	—	+69	—	+62	41.2%	-0.47	1–3 (25%)	2–1 (67%)	98.8	+0.86	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1972	1566	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	+71	52.9%	-0.20	2–0	7–2 (78%)	—	+0.23	1968	1485	103.8	—	—	—	—	-17	+56	—	44.9%	-0.45	1–3 (25%)	—	—	+0.33
21	1973	1568	115.6	—	—	—	—	-68	-6	+8	43.1%	-0.54	4–6 (40%)	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.49	1969	1452	100.2	—	—	—	—	—	+12	—	36.0%	-0.80	1–2 (33%)	—	—	+0.20
22	1974	1719	135.2	—	—	—	—	+34	—	-72	57.9%	+0.40	8–8 (50%)	9–5 (64%)	106.3	+3.07	1970	1426	98.3	—	—	—	—	—	+41	—	26.7%	-1.47	—	0–2	—	+0.50
23	1975	1740	131.7	—	—	—	—	-43	-121	+35	53.0%	-0.02	8–6 (57%)	10–3 (77%)	108.6	+1.45	1971	1424	108.2	—	—	—	—	—	+51	—	41.9%	-0.71	0–2	—	—	+0.46
24	1976	1750	140.2	—	—	—	—	-100	-13	+61	52.1%	+0.06	6–14 (30%)	9–9 (50%)	95.7	0.00	1972	1631	121.0	—	—	—	—	—	+9	-106	48.3%	-0.25	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	-0.26
25	1977	1714	136.9	—	—	—	—	-91	+94	+27	53.7%	+0.18	14–4 (78%)	8–3 (73%)	111.3	+1.00	1973	1740	130.0	—	—	—	—	+16	-6	-112	61.6%	+0.84	13–8 (62%)	4–7 (36%)	103.2	+7.77
26	1978	1790	148.1	—	—	—	—	-41	-3	+16	52.6%	+0.14	12–6 (67%)	12–12 (50%)	107.1	-1.65	1974	1736	132.1	—	—	—	—	+5	+28	-65	56.6%	+0.54	12–15 (44%)	10–10 (50%)	96.5	+4.93
27	1979	1808	135.7	—	—	—	—	-13	-87	+52	56.5%	+0.25	9–5 (64%)	13–6 (68%)	108.0	+3.20	1975	1681	128.8	—	—	—	—	+35	+35	—	55.5%	+0.13	8–11 (42%)	12–8 (60%)	98.5	+4.18
28	1980	1928	142.9	—	—	—	—	-103	-179	+49	57.2%	+0.61	16–7 (70%)	8–12 (40%)	104.8	-0.21	1976	1662	124.0	—	—	—	—	+24	+51	—	48.1%	-0.46	3–5 (38%)	5–2 (71%)	98.1	+0.19
29	1981	1758	117.9	—	—	—	—	-77	—	+186	47.2%	+0.08	2–1 (67%)	1–4 (20%)	98.1	+1.26	1977	1684	129.0	—	—	—	—	-46	+78	-90	49.0%	-0.44	8–6 (57%)	8–3 (73%)	103.8	+1.27
30	1982	1786	145.7	—	—	—	—	+24	-97	+71	52.1%	+0.49	5–5 (50%)	2–7 (22%)	97.2	-1.50	1978	1671	125.2	—	—	—	—	—	+46	—	47.6%	-0.36	4–2 (67%)	2–2 (50%)	100.6	+0.04
31	1983	1681	108.0	—	—	—	—	+19	—	—	34.5%	-0.90	2–1 (67%)	1–2 (33%)	99.8	+0.49	1979	1630	98.1	—	—	—	—	+11	+12	—	44.4%	-1.17	0–2	3–0 (100%)	—	+1.64
32	1984	1690	121.4	—	—	—	—	—	+41	+128	65.2%	+0.87	3–2 (60%)	1–1	—	+0.40	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1985	1668	111.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-1.33	0–1	1–1	—	-0.42	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1988	1655	100.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.23	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1947	139.7	—	—	—	—	-34	-32	+42	52.6%	+0.13	94–71 (57%)	86–71 (55%)	110.5	+1.90	—	1888	129.4	—	—	—	—	+8	+37	-96	52.5%	+0.06	52–57 (48%)	45–35 (56%)	99.8	+6.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Kim Warwick's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Roscoe Tanner	4	5	9	Dec 1, 1983	H2H
Geoff Masters	4	5	9	Oct 27, 1978	H2H
Sandy Mayer	3	5	8	Mar 14, 1981	H2H
Raul Ramirez	3	5	8	Apr 29, 1978	H2H
Tim Gullikson	2	5	7	Nov 10, 1983	—

Jurgen Fassbender's most-played ATP rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Jimmy Connors	1	7	8	Oct 7, 1977	H2H
Sandy Mayer	3	5	8	Oct 14, 1975	H2H
Georges Goven	4	3	7	Jul 20, 1978	H2H
Roscoe Tanner	2	4	6	May 31, 1978	H2H
Ilie Nastase	0	6	6	Mar 15, 1974	H2H