H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 0-2
Ken Rosewall holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1979 Brisbane quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1979* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Ken Rosewall | 6-2 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1973* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 6-3 6-1 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |