H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Marty Davis H2H: 0-1

Marty Davis holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marty Davis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marty Davis won the 1984 Sydney International round of 32 4-6 7-6 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Marty Davis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marty Davis #52 4-6 7-6 (ret.) Kim Warwick #204 Match data Dec 13, 1984* R32 Sydney International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marty Davis #811 #47 158 1,797 151 173 46.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Marty Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% #301 1,483 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1981 14–18 43.8% — 1,605 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1982 16–22 42.1% #99 1,581 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1983 10–11 47.6% #84 1,611 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1984 25–19 56.8% #64 1,733 0 1
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1985 20–19 51.3% #63 1,710 0 3
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1986 21–25 45.7% #89 1,627 0 3
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1987 16–17 48.5% #96 1,652 0 3
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1988 20–25 44.4% #95 1,652 0 3
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1989 9–14 39.1% #143 1,618 0 3
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1990 0–2 0.0% #507 1,590 0 3
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Marty Davis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1981 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1982 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 13 9 22 59.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1986 10 11 21 47.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 13 10 23 56.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 13 15 28 46.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1989 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 77 85 162 47.5% 17 26 43 39.5% 28 27 55 50.9% 29 35 64 45.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Marty Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1978 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1981 1606 128.1 — — — — +35 -73 -29 45.5% -0.23 5–9 (36%) 8–8 (50%) — +1.65
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1982 1582 128.9 — — — — +41 -67 -7 44.9% -0.02 2–8 (20%) 3–12 (20%) — +2.20
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1983 1612 119.4 — — — — -14 — +24 47.1% -0.06 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.74
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1984 1733 133.2 — — — — -28 -224 +11 52.7% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 9–11 (45%) — +2.05
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1985 1711 137.6 — — — — +1 -217 +64 51.6% +0.25 5–7 (42%) 5–13 (28%) — +0.65
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1986 1628 131.4 — — — — +20 -86 +76 48.7% +0.07 8–12 (40%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.70
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1987 1653 132.7 — — — — +29 -104 +23 49.4% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.33
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1988 1653 130.5 — — — — +16 -106 -2 46.3% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.96
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1989 1619 125.3 — — — — +40 — — 43.8% -0.33 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.42
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1990 1591 103.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 1–1 — -0.03
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1798 136.0 — — — — +15 -116 +17 47.8% -0.03 46–66 (41%) 69–88 (44%) 92.6 +2.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.