H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Mike Cahill H2H: 1-1

Kim Warwick and Mike Cahill are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Mike Cahill won the 1977 US Open round of 128 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Mike Cahill
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mike Cahill 6-3 7-6 Kim Warwick #38 Match data Sep 2, 1977* R128 US Open Grand Slam Clay
Kim Warwick 0-6 6-4 6-2 Mike Cahill Match data Nov 27, 1976* QF Bangalore ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mike Cahill #448 #58 0 1,727 100 156 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Mike Cahill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1974 4–4 50.0% #138 1,539 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1975 10–17 37.0% #79 1,585 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1976 13–27 32.5% #136 1,587 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1977 10–18 35.7% #94 1,574 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1978 17–20 45.9% #69 1,692 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1979 18–25 41.9% #113 1,678 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1980 10–19 34.5% #189 1,601 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1981 6–10 37.5% #100 1,629 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1982 12–14 46.2% #98 1,644 0 0
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1983 0–2 0.0% #108 1,621 0 0
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Mike Cahill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1975 3 4 7 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1976 1 4 5 20.0% 9 15 24 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1977 2 3 5 40.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1978 5 6 11 45.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 6 9 15 40.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1979 9 9 18 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 4 4 8 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 33 40 73 45.2% 49 66 115 42.6% 0 6 6 0.0% 18 44 62 29.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Mike Cahill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1974 1540 112.1 — — — — — +29 — 50.0% -0.44 1–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.47
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1975 1586 128.8 — — — — 0 -9 — 42.9% -0.51 2–9 (18%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.58
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1976 1587 130.4 — — — — -15 -18 — 36.8% -0.84 4–7 (36%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.12
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1977 1574 122.9 — — — — +16 -15 — 40.3% -0.63 4–7 (36%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.24
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1978 1692 139.6 — — — — -36 -53 — 45.8% +0.05 5–4 (56%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.86
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1979 1679 129.0 — — — — -28 +8 -236 42.7% -0.57 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.42
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1980 1602 134.8 — — — — +14 +31 — 35.5% -0.68 1–4 (20%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.50
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1981 1630 125.6 — — — — +36 — — 44.7% -0.55 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.59
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1982 1644 127.1 — — — — -2 +3 — 46.6% -0.35 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) — +1.34
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1983 1621 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.27
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1728 136.1 — — — — -7 -5 -236 41.6% -0.53 29–45 (39%) 35–34 (51%) 100.1 +1.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.