H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Paolo Bertolucci H2H: 2-2
Kim Warwick and Paolo Bertolucci are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paolo Bertolucci leads 2–1 on clay, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Bertolucci won the 1981 Nations Cup round-robin match 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 74
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1981 | Nations Cup | ATP 250 | RR | Clay | Paolo Bertolucci | 6-4 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Jul 6, 1977* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Kim Warwick | 6-4 6-3 | Paolo Bertolucci | Match data |
| May 12, 1977* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Bertolucci | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1975* | Johannesburg - Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kim Warwick | (w/o) | Paolo Bertolucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paolo Bertolucci | #382 | #12 | 0 | 1,930 | 198 | 150 | 56.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Paolo Bertolucci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #20 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #50 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #158 | 1,739 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #72 | 1,761 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #138 | 1,657 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #285 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |