H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Patricio Cornejo H2H: 1-0

Kim Warwick holds a 1–0 lead over Patricio Cornejo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1972 Eastbourne round of 32 7-5 2-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Patricio Cornejo
CHI Age 82 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Warwick 7-5 2-6 7-5 Patricio Cornejo Match data Jun 26, 1972* R32 Eastbourne ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Patricio Cornejo #335 #65 0 1,709 142 202 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Patricio Cornejo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1968 23–16 59.0% — 1,599 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1969 13–11 54.2% — 1,588 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1970 10–15 40.0% — 1,579 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1971 13–20 39.4% — 1,547 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1972 11–19 36.7% — 1,578 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1973 11–23 32.4% #99 1,552 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1974 20–31 39.2% #66 1,613 0 0
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1975 8–22 26.7% #138 1,581 0 0
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 1976 13–15 46.4% #108 1,626 0 0
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 1977 14–14 50.0% #89 1,685 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 1978 6–16 27.3% #172 1,586 0 0
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Patricio Cornejo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1968 — — — — 14 9 23 60.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — —
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1969 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1970 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1971 2 8 10 20.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1974 4 8 12 33.3% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 — — — — 14 14 28 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 16 35 51 31.4% 95 112 207 45.9% 23 33 56 41.1% 8 22 30 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Patricio Cornejo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 106.3 +3.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 108.6 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) 95.7 +0.01 1968 1600 110.9 — — — — — -21 +16 57.3% +0.36 3–6 (33%) — — +0.70
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) 111.3 +1.00 1969 1589 105.3 — — — — — +5 -2 50.8% -0.09 5–2 (71%) — — +0.34
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) 107.1 -1.65 1970 1579 111.3 — — — — -29 +52 -62 41.5% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.1 -0.73
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) 108.0 +3.20 1971 1548 115.5 — — — — -116 +126 -37 37.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 +0.42
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) 104.8 -0.21 1972 1579 114.4 — — — — -122 +70 -55 40.8% -0.57 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.0 +0.47
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.1 +1.26 1973 1552 122.9 — — — — -99 +56 — 34.2% -0.99 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 92.9 -0.05
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 97.2 -1.50 1974 1613 135.4 — — — — -87 +63 -172 44.3% -0.19 6–11 (35%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 -1.79
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.49 1975 1581 135.2 — — — — -77 +40 -134 32.3% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -2.08
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1976 1627 119.8 — — — — -51 -36 — 48.5% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 +1.82
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 1977 1686 123.4 — — — — — -6 — 46.4% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 1–5 (17%) 102.3 +1.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1587 122.9 — — — — — -12 — 30.2% -1.04 4–3 (57%) 1–5 (17%) 97.6 -1.19
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1710 125.6 — — — — -89 +26 -30 43.0% -0.42 39–51 (43%) 25–46 (35%) 91.6 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.