H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Paul Mcnamee H2H: 0-3
Paul Mcnamee holds a 3–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paul Mcnamee leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Mcnamee won the 1982 Queen's Club second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 1982* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Paul Mcnamee | 6-3 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Dec 23, 1977* | Australian Open (2) | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Paul Mcnamee | 7-5 6-7 7-6 7-5 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| May 27, 1977* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Paul Mcnamee | 6-3 7-6 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Paul Mcnamee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |