H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Kim Warwick vs Pierre Barthes H2H: 1-2
Pierre Barthes holds a 2–1 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Pierre Barthes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Warwick won the 1975 Monte Carlo Wct third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 84
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 1975* | Monte Carlo Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Kim Warwick | 6-3 6-1 | Pierre Barthes | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1972* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Pierre Barthes | 6-3 6-2 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| May 25, 1971* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pierre Barthes | 6-3 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pierre Barthes | #265 | #57 | 0 | 1,887 | 185 | 190 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Warwick | Pierre Barthes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 29–46 | 38.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 22–29 | 43.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 47–25 | 65.3% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 40–25 | 61.5% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #79 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #222 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #247 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |