H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Kim Warwick vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 2-1

Kim Warwick holds a 2–1 lead over Ricardo Cano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Kim Warwick leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1977 Columbus round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Warwick
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Ricardo Cano
ARG Age 75 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardo Cano #92 6-0 6-0 Kim Warwick #39 Match data Aug 11, 1977* R32 Columbus ATP 250 Clay
Kim Warwick #62 6-3 6-4 Ricardo Cano #64 Match data May 11, 1977* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Kim Warwick #68 6-4 6-2 6-1 Ricardo Cano #49 Match data Jun 23, 1976* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Warwick #1,294 #15 15 1,946 288 269 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ricardo Cano #768 #42 0 1,797 140 145 49.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Warwick Ricardo Cano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1970 6–8 42.9% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 4–7 36.4% — 1,463 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1972 11–9 55.0% — 1,566 0 0 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
21 1973 11–22 33.3% #108 1,567 0 0 1972 2–5 28.6% — 1,477 0 0
22 1974 30–23 56.6% #48 1,718 0 0 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,489 0 0
23 1975 27–23 54.0% #49 1,739 0 0 1974 2–2 50.0% #274 1,503 0 0
24 1976 28–32 46.7% #67 1,750 0 1 1975 18–13 58.1% #42 1,738 0 0
25 1977 35–29 54.7% #42 1,713 0 1 1976 43–26 62.3% #51 1,732 0 0
26 1978 29–23 55.8% #41 1,790 0 1 1977 18–24 42.9% #99 1,674 0 0
27 1979 36–25 59.0% #52 1,808 0 2 1978 10–13 43.5% #81 1,632 0 0
28 1980 39–25 60.9% #36 1,927 0 3 1979 3–10 23.1% #169 1,566 0 0
29 1981 6–11 35.3% #29 1,758 0 3 1980 3–8 27.3% #73 1,543 0 0
30 1982 15–15 50.0% #36 1,786 0 3 1981 33–24 57.9% #62 1,716 0 0
31 1983 3–7 30.0% #99 1,681 0 3 1982 3–11 21.4% #91 1,608 0 0
32 1984 6–5 54.5% #196 1,690 0 3 1983 4–6 40.0% #219 1,580 0 0
33 1985 1–3 25.0% #497 1,667 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 1988 1–1 50.0% #600 1,655 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Warwick Ricardo Cano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1974 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1975 5 7 12 41.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 8 19 57.9% 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1976 5 6 11 45.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 1975 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 38 23 61 62.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 1977 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1978 — — — — 10 13 23 43.5% — — — — — — — —
28 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 — — — — 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — — — — —
29 1981 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 4 1 5 80.0% 29 22 51 56.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
32 1984 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 68 127 46.5% 80 74 154 51.9% 95 70 165 57.6% 54 57 111 48.6% — 9 8 17 52.9% 128 129 257 49.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Warwick Ricardo Cano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1969 1483 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 1469 102.8 — — — — — — +41 43.8% -0.16 1–2 (33%) — — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1464 110.3 — — — — +69 — +62 41.2% -0.47 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.86 1970 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.67 — — — -0.19
20 1972 1566 111.3 — — — — — — +71 52.9% -0.20 2–0 7–2 (78%) — +0.23 1971 1490 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.20
21 1973 1567 117.1 — — — — -67 -6 +9 41.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.29 1972 1477 95.2 — — — — — +34 — 30.0% -1.45 1–1 — — +0.44
22 1974 1718 135.3 — — — — +35 — -71 57.9% +0.40 8–8 (50%) 9–5 (64%) — +3.10 1973 1490 106.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
23 1975 1740 131.7 — — — — -44 -122 +35 53.0% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) — +1.45 1974 1504 106.5 — — — — — +29 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.69
24 1976 1750 140.2 — — — — -100 -13 +61 52.1% +0.06 6–14 (30%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.01 1975 1739 141.6 — — — — — +46 — 51.9% +0.06 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.44
25 1977 1714 136.9 — — — — -91 +94 +27 53.7% +0.18 14–4 (78%) 8–3 (73%) — +1.00 1976 1732 133.4 — — — — -109 +26 — 56.2% +0.47 14–8 (64%) 7–4 (64%) — +6.25
26 1978 1790 148.2 — — — — -41 -3 +16 52.6% +0.14 12–6 (67%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.65 1977 1674 138.6 — — — — -85 +10 — 43.4% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.77
27 1979 1808 135.7 — — — — -13 -87 +52 56.5% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 13–6 (68%) — +3.20 1978 1632 125.5 — — — — — +5 — 44.6% -0.20 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +1.33
28 1980 1928 142.9 — — — — -103 -179 +49 57.2% +0.61 16–7 (70%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.21 1979 1567 118.1 — — — — — -5 — 36.1% -0.89 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.24
29 1981 1758 117.9 — — — — -77 — +186 47.2% +0.08 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.26 1980 1543 122.9 — — — — — -2 — 37.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) — — +0.12
30 1982 1786 145.7 — — — — +25 -97 +71 52.1% +0.49 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.50 1981 1717 140.9 — — — — -79 +17 — 54.5% +0.30 11–4 (73%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.92
31 1983 1681 108.0 — — — — +19 — — 34.5% -0.90 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49 1982 1608 117.3 — — — — -14 +43 — 26.5% -1.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.08
32 1984 1690 121.4 — — — — — +41 +128 65.2% +0.87 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +0.40 1983 1581 107.3 — — — — — +48 — 46.4% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.87
33 1985 1668 111.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1988 1655 100.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1947 139.8 — — — — -34 -32 +42 52.5% +0.13 94–71 (57%) 86–71 (55%) 110.5 +1.86 — 1797 137.7 — — — — -81 +21 — 47.7% -0.16 51–43 (54%) 33–30 (52%) 106.0 +3.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.